Product comparison · 2 internal solid state drives

Samsung 870 EVO vs XPG GAMMIX S70

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 5identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung 870 EVO has 7 TB more SSD capacity than the XPG GAMMIX S70 (8 TB vs 1 TB). The XPG GAMMIX S70 has 6,840 MB/s more read speed than the Samsung 870 EVO (7400 MB/s vs 560 MB/s). The XPG GAMMIX S70 has 5,870 MB/s more write speed than the Samsung 870 EVO (6400 MB/s vs 530 MB/s). Only the XPG GAMMIX S70 has NVMe. SSD form factor: 2.5" on the Samsung 870 EVO, M.2 on the XPG GAMMIX S70.

  • SSD capacity
    • 870 EVO:8 TB
    • GAMMIX S70:1 TB
  • SSD form factor
    • 870 EVO:2.5"
    • GAMMIX S70:M.2
  • Interface
    • 870 EVO:Serial ATA III
    • GAMMIX S70:PCI Express 4.0
  • NVMe
    • 870 EVO:No
    • GAMMIX S70:Yes
  • Memory type
    • 870 EVO:V-NAND TLC
    • GAMMIX S70:3D NAND
  • Read speed
    • 870 EVO:560 MB/s
    • GAMMIX S70:7400 MB/s
  • Write speed
    • 870 EVO:530 MB/s
    • GAMMIX S70:6400 MB/s
  • Mean time between failures (MTBF)
    • 870 EVO:1500000 h
    • GAMMIX S70:2000000 h

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 870 EVO, GAMMIX S70
42 specifications
Features8 differ
SSD capacityDiffers8 TB1 TB
SSD form factorDiffers2.5"M.2
InterfaceDiffersSerial ATA IIIPCI Express 4.0
NVMeDiffersNoYes
Memory typeDiffersV-NAND TLC3D NAND
Component forPCPC
Hardware encryptionYesYes
Security algorithms256-bit AES256-bit AES
Data transfer rateKnown for one6 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Read speedDiffers560 MB/s7400 MB/s
Write speedDiffers530 MB/s6400 MB/s
Random read (4KB)Known for one98000 IOPSUnknown — not stated by the source
Random write (4KB)Known for one88000 IOPSUnknown — not stated by the source
DevSlp (device sleep) supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
S.M.A.R.T. supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
TRIM supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs1500000 h2000000 h
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 10, Windows 10 x64, Windows 7, Windows 7 x64, Windows 8, Windows 8 x64, Windows VistaUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Server operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows Server 2003, Windows Server 2003 x64Unknown — not stated by the source
TBW ratingKnown for one1200Unknown — not stated by the source
NVMe versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.4
PCI Express interface data lanesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcex4
End-to-End Data ProtectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
Operating voltageKnown for one5 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (read)Known for one2.2 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (write)Known for one2.6 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (max)Known for one4.5 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (average)Known for one2.5 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (idle)Known for one0.04 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers100.1 mm25 mm
DepthDiffers6.9 mm80 mm
HeightDiffers69.9 mm15 mm
WeightDiffers86.2 g34 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 70 °C0 - 70 °C
Operating shock1500 G1500 G
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 85 °C
Maximum operating temperatureKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source70 °C
Minimum operating temperatureKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 °C
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source84717070

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal solid state drive comparisons

All internal solid state drive comparisons