Product comparison · 2 internal solid state drives

Kingston Technology DC1500M U.2 Entreprise vs Kingston Technology 2048G KC3000 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD

20specifications compared
15differ
5identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

SSD capacity
- DC1500M U.2 Entreprise:1.92 TB
- 2048G KC3000 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD:2 TB
SSD form factor
- DC1500M U.2 Entreprise:U.2
- 2048G KC3000 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD:M.2
Interface
- DC1500M U.2 Entreprise:PCI Express 3.0
- 2048G KC3000 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD:PCI Express 4.0
Read speed
- DC1500M U.2 Entreprise:3300 MB/s
- 2048G KC3000 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD:7000 MB/s
Write speed
- DC1500M U.2 Entreprise:2700 MB/s
- 2048G KC3000 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD:7000 MB/s
Random read (4KB)
- DC1500M U.2 Entreprise:510000 IOPS
- 2048G KC3000 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD:1000000 IOPS
Random write (4KB)
- DC1500M U.2 Entreprise:220000 IOPS
- 2048G KC3000 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD:1000000 IOPS
Mean time between failures (MTBF)
- DC1500M U.2 Entreprise:2000000 h
- 2048G KC3000 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD:1800000 h

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DC1500M U.2 Entreprise, KC3000
45 specifications	A Kingston Technology DC1500M U.2 Entreprise View product	B Kingston Technology 2048G KC3000 M.2 2280 NVMe SSD Model KC3000 View product
Features8 differ
SSD capacityDiffers	1.92 TB	2 TB
SSD form factorDiffers	U.2	M.2
InterfaceDiffers	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 4.0
M.2 SSD sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2280 (22 x 80 mm)
Read speedDiffers	3300 MB/s	7000 MB/s
Write speedDiffers	2700 MB/s	7000 MB/s
Random read (4KB)Differs	510000 IOPS	1000000 IOPS
Random write (4KB)Differs	220000 IOPS	1000000 IOPS
Controller typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Phison E18
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs	2000000 h	1800000 h
TBW ratingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1600
Read latencyKnown for one	110 µs	Unknown — not stated by the source
Write latencyKnown for one	206 µs	Unknown — not stated by the source
PCI Express interface data lanesKnown for one	x4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power loss protectionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Endurance rating (for 5 years)Known for one	1 GB/day	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Power consumption (read)Differs	6.63 W	2.8 W
Power consumption (write)Differs	15.36 W	9.9 W
Power consumption (average)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.36 W
Power consumption (idle)Differs	6.6 W	0.005 W
Average power consumption (read)Known for one	6.3 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Average power consumption (write)Known for one	13.7 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	100.1 mm	80 mm
DepthDiffers	14.8 mm	22 mm
HeightDiffers	69.8 mm	3.5 mm
WeightDiffers	150 g	9.7 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	129.5 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8.38 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	184.2 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	34.03 g
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 85 °C
Operating vibrationKnown for one	2.17 G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating vibrationKnown for one	20 G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Cooling typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Heatsink
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	China, Taiwan
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	135.9 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	203.2 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	69.8 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	418.29 g
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal solid state drive comparisons

All internal solid state drive comparisons