Product comparison · 2 internal solid state drives

Fujitsu FTS:ETPSA4A internal solid state drive vs HP 795968-001 internal solid state drive

3specifications compared
3differ
0identical
6known for one product only

Key differences

The Fujitsu FTS:ETPSA4A internal solid state drive has 144 GB more SSD capacity than the HP 795968-001 internal solid state drive (400 GB vs 256 GB). The Fujitsu FTS:ETPSA4A internal solid state drive has 6 Gbit/s more data transfer rate than the HP 795968-001 internal solid state drive (12 Gbit/s vs 6 Gbit/s). Interface: SAS on the Fujitsu FTS:ETPSA4A internal solid state drive, Serial ATA III on the HP 795968-001 internal solid state drive.

SSD capacity
- FTS:ETPSA4A internal solid state drive:400 GB
- 795968-001 internal solid state drive:256 GB
Interface
- FTS:ETPSA4A internal solid state drive:SAS
- 795968-001 internal solid state drive:Serial ATA III
Data transfer rate
- FTS:ETPSA4A internal solid state drive:12 Gbit/s
- 795968-001 internal solid state drive:6 Gbit/s

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FTS:ETPSA4A, 795968-001
9 specifications	A Fujitsu FTS:ETPSA4A internal solid state drive Model FTS:ETPSA4A View product	B HP 795968-001 internal solid state drive Model 795968-001 View product
Features3 differ
SSD capacityDiffers	400 GB	256 GB
SSD form factorKnown for one	2.5"	Unknown — not stated by the source
InterfaceDiffers	SAS	Serial ATA III
Memory typeKnown for one	MLC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rateDiffers	12 Gbit/s	6 Gbit/s
NVMeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Component forKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PC/Laptop
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TCG Opal2
Other featuresidentical
InternalKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal solid state drive comparisons

All internal solid state drive comparisons