Product comparison · 2 internal solid state drives

Dahua Technology SSD-C800N512G vs Dahua Technology SSD-C900AN2000G

Key differences

SSD capacity
- SSD-C800N512G:512 GB
- SSD-C900AN2000G:2 TB
Interface
- SSD-C800N512G:Serial ATA III
- SSD-C900AN2000G:PCI Express 3.0
NVMe
- SSD-C800N512G:No
- SSD-C900AN2000G:Yes
Random read (4KB)
- SSD-C800N512G:39000 IOPS
- SSD-C900AN2000G:230000 IOPS
Random write (4KB)
- SSD-C800N512G:79000 IOPS
- SSD-C900AN2000G:27000 IOPS
Sequential read speed (ATTO)
- SSD-C800N512G:530 MB/s
- SSD-C900AN2000G:3000 MB/s
Sequential write speed (ATTO)
- SSD-C800N512G:450 MB/s
- SSD-C900AN2000G:1800 MB/s
TBW rating
- SSD-C800N512G:200
- SSD-C900AN2000G:800

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SSD-C800N512G, SSD-C900AN2000G
31 specifications	A Dahua Technology SSD-C800N512G Model SSD-C800N512G View product	B Dahua Technology SSD-C900AN2000G Model SSD-C900AN2000G View product
Features8 differ
SSD capacityDiffers	512 GB	2 TB
InterfaceDiffers	Serial ATA III	PCI Express 3.0
NVMeDiffers	No	Yes
M.2 SSD sizeKnown for one	2280 (22 x 80 mm)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Random read (4KB)Differs	39000 IOPS	230000 IOPS
Random write (4KB)Differs	79000 IOPS	27000 IOPS
Sequential read speed (ATTO)Differs	530 MB/s	3000 MB/s
Sequential write speed (ATTO)Differs	450 MB/s	1800 MB/s
TBW ratingDiffers	200	800
NVMe versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.3
Power1 differ
Power consumption (max)Differs	1.65 W	0.63 W
Power consumption (average)Known for one	0.74 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (write)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
HeightDiffers	2.2 mm	3.6 mm
Operational conditionsidentical
Vibration resistanceKnown for one	0.5 G	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.