Product comparison · 2 internal solid state drives

CoreParts MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive vs Seagate Pulsar 2

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 1identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The Seagate Pulsar 2 has 92 GB more SSD capacity than the CoreParts MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive (100 GB vs 8 GB). The Seagate Pulsar 2 has 0.7" more SSD form factor than the CoreParts MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive (2.5" vs 1.8"). The Seagate Pulsar 2 has 1,000,000 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the CoreParts MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive (2000000 h vs 1000000 h). Interface: ZIF on the CoreParts MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive, SAS on the Seagate Pulsar 2. Memory type: SLC on the CoreParts MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive, MLC on the Seagate Pulsar 2.

  • SSD capacity
    • MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive:8 GB
    • Pulsar 2:100 GB
  • SSD form factor
    • MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive:1.8"
    • Pulsar 2:2.5"
  • Interface
    • MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive:ZIF
    • Pulsar 2:SAS
  • Memory type
    • MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive:SLC
    • Pulsar 2:MLC
  • Mean time between failures (MTBF)
    • MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive:1000000 h
    • Pulsar 2:2000000 h
  • Width
    • MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive:54.1 mm
    • Pulsar 2:70.1 mm
  • Depth
    • MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive:71.1 mm
    • Pulsar 2:100.5 mm
  • Height
    • MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ internal solid state drive:5 mm
    • Pulsar 2:7 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of MSD-ZF18.1-008SJ, Pulsar 2
31 specifications
Features5 differ
SSD capacityDiffers8 GB100 GB
SSD form factorDiffers1.8"2.5"
InterfaceDiffersZIFSAS
Memory typeDiffersSLCMLC
Read speedKnown for one32 MB/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Write speedKnown for one30 MB/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Access timeKnown for one0.2 msUnknown — not stated by the source
ECCKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Data retentionKnown for one10 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs1000000 h2000000 h
Component forKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceServer/workstation
Data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 Gbit/s
Random read (4KB)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source48000 IOPS
Random write (4KB)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12000 IOPS
Poweridentical
Operating voltageKnown for one3.3 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (read)Known for one1.5 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (write)Known for one1.5 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one0.5 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers54.1 mm70.1 mm
DepthDiffers71.1 mm100.5 mm
HeightDiffers5 mm7 mm
WeightDiffers40 g100 g
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 70 °C0 - 60 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-40 - 85 °C-40 - 70 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating vibrationKnown for one20 GUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating shockDiffers2000 G1000 G
Operating shockKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000 G
Other features1 differ
Product colourDiffersSilverBlack, Silver
InternalYesYes
Compatible productsKnown for oneAsus U Notebook Series: U1F, U2E Dell Latitude: D420 (Crockett), D430 (Carson) Fujitsu Lifebook P Series: P1620 Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U Series: U1010, U2010, U810 HP/Compaq Business Notebook: 2510P, 2710P HP/Compaq Mini: 1010TU HTC Mobile: Shift X9500 IBM/Lenovo IdeaPad: U110 LG A: A1 Samsung Notebook Q:Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal solid state drive comparisons

All internal solid state drive comparisons