Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Seagate SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive vs Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive

Add a product
  • 16specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 5identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

The Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive has 4 TB more HDD capacity than the Seagate SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive (8 TB vs 4 TB). The Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive has 6 Gbit/s more HDD interface transfer rate than the Seagate SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive (12 Gbit/s vs 6 Gbit/s). The Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive has 1,000,000 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the Seagate SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive (2000000 h vs 1000000 h). Interface: Serial ATA III on the Seagate SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive, SAS on the Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive. Component for: Digital video recorder (DVR) on the Seagate SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive, Disk array on the Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive.

  • HDD capacity
    • SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive:4 TB
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:8 TB
  • Interface
    • SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive:Serial ATA III
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:SAS
  • Component for
    • SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive:Digital video recorder (DVR)
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:Disk array
  • HDD interface transfer rate
    • SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive:6 Gbit/s
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:12 Gbit/s
  • Mean time between failures (MTBF)
    • SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive:1000000 h
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:2000000 h
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive:3.7 W
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:12 W
  • Power consumption (idle)
    • SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive:2.5 W
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:8.5 W
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • SkyHawk ST4000VX005 internal hard drive:0 - 70 °C
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:5 - 60 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ST4000VX005, ST8000NM0135-RF
28 specifications
Features5 differ
HDD capacityDiffers4 TB8 TB
HDD speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7200 RPM
HDD size3.5"3.5"
InterfaceDiffersSerial ATA IIISAS
TypeHDDHDD
Component forDiffersDigital video recorder (DVR)Disk array
Storage drive buffer size256 MB256 MB
HDD interface transfer rateDiffers6 Gbit/s12 Gbit/s
Average latencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.16 ms
Rotational Vibration (RV) sensorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
24/7 operationYesYes
RefurbishedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs1000000 h2000000 h
Uncorrectable Bit Error Rate (UBER)Known for one< 1 per 10^14 bits readUnknown — not stated by the source
Start/stop cyclesKnown for one600000Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs3.7 W12 W
Power consumption (idle)Differs2.5 W8.5 W
Operating voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 / 12 V
Power consumption (standby)Known for one0.25 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Start-up currentKnown for one1.8 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 70 °C5 - 60 °C
Operating shockKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source70 G
Non-operating shockKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source250 G
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width101.8 mm101.8 mm
DepthDiffers20.2 mm147 mm
HeightDiffers147 mm26.1 mm
WeightDiffers490 g780 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons