Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Seagate IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive vs Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0075-RF internal hard drive

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 6identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Seagate IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive has 24 TB more HDD capacity than the Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0075-RF internal hard drive (32 TB vs 8 TB). The Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0075-RF internal hard drive has 6 Gbit/s more HDD interface transfer rate than the Seagate IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive (12 Gbit/s vs 6 Gbit/s). The Seagate IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive has 500,000 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0075-RF internal hard drive (2500000 h vs 2000000 h). Interface: Serial ATA III on the Seagate IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive, SAS on the Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0075-RF internal hard drive.

  • HDD capacity
    • IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:32 TB
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0075-RF internal hard drive:8 TB
  • Interface
    • IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:Serial ATA III
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0075-RF internal hard drive:SAS
  • HDD interface transfer rate
    • IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:6 Gbit/s
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0075-RF internal hard drive:12 Gbit/s
  • Mean time between failures (MTBF)
    • IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:2500000 h
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0075-RF internal hard drive:2000000 h
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:8.3 W
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0075-RF internal hard drive:10 W
  • Power consumption (idle)
    • IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:6.8 W
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0075-RF internal hard drive:9 W
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:10 - 60 °C
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0075-RF internal hard drive:5 - 60 °C
  • Non-operating vibration
    • IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:2.27 G
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0075-RF internal hard drive:5 G

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ST32000NT000, ST8000NM0075-RF
31 specifications
Features4 differ
HDD capacityDiffers32 TB8 TB
InterfaceDiffersSerial ATA IIISAS
Storage drive buffer sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source256 MB
HDD interface transfer rateDiffers6 Gbit/s12 Gbit/s
HDD sustained transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source237 MiB/s
Average latencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.16 ms
RefurbishedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs2500000 h2000000 h
Component forKnown for oneLaptopUnknown — not stated by the source
Hot-swapKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Hybrid-HDD cache memoryKnown for one512 GBUnknown — not stated by the source
Bytes per sectorKnown for one512eUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs8.3 W10 W
Power consumption (idle)Differs6.8 W9 W
Operating voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 / 12 V
Power consumption (standby)Known for one1.2 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Start-up currentKnown for one2 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs10 - 60 °C5 - 60 °C
Non-operating vibrationDiffers2.27 G5 G
Operating shockKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source70 G
Non-operating shockKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source300 G
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 70 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers695 g780 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 pc(s)
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source84717050

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons