Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Seagate IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive vs Seagate Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive

15specifications compared
9differ
6identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

The Seagate IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive has 26 TB more HDD capacity than the Seagate Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive (32 TB vs 6 TB). The Seagate Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive has 6 Gbit/s more HDD interface transfer rate than the Seagate IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive (12 Gbit/s vs 6 Gbit/s). The Seagate IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive has 500,000 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the Seagate Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive (2500000 h vs 2000000 h). Interface: Serial ATA III on the Seagate IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive, SAS on the Seagate Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive.

HDD capacity
- IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:32 TB
- Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive:6 TB
Interface
- IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:Serial ATA III
- Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive:SAS
HDD interface transfer rate
- IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:6 Gbit/s
- Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive:12 Gbit/s
Mean time between failures (MTBF)
- IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:2500000 h
- Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive:2000000 h
Power consumption (typical)
- IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:8.3 W
- Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive:11.1 W
Power consumption (idle)
- IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:6.8 W
- Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive:6.9 W
Operating temperature (T-T)
- IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:10 - 60 °C
- Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive:5 - 60 °C
Non-operating vibration
- IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive:2.27 G
- Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive:5 G

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ST32000NT000, ST6000NM0105-RF
29 specifications	A Seagate IronWolf Pro ST32000NT000 internal hard drive Model ST32000NT000 View product	B Seagate Enterprise ST6000NM0105-RF internal hard drive Model ST6000NM0105-RF View product
Features4 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	32 TB	6 TB
HDD speed	7200 RPM	7200 RPM
HDD size	3.5"	3.5"
InterfaceDiffers	Serial ATA III	SAS
Type	HDD	HDD
Component forKnown for one	Laptop	Unknown — not stated by the source
Hot-swapKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Hybrid-HDD cache memoryKnown for one	512 GB	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDD interface transfer rateDiffers	6 Gbit/s	12 Gbit/s
Bytes per sectorKnown for one	512e	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs	2500000 h	2000000 h
Storage drive buffer sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	256 MB
Average latencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.16 ms
RefurbishedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	8.3 W	11.1 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	1.2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (idle)Differs	6.8 W	6.9 W
Start-up currentKnown for one	2 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 / 12 V
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	10 - 60 °C	5 - 60 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-40 - 70 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating vibrationDiffers	2.27 G	5 G
Operating shockKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	70 G
Non-operating shockKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	250 G
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width	101.8 mm	101.8 mm
Depth	147 mm	147 mm
Height	26.1 mm	26.1 mm
WeightDiffers	695 g	700 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons