Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Seagate IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive vs Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 9identical
  • 10known for one product only

Key differences

The Seagate IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive has 20 TB more HDD capacity than the Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive (28 TB vs 8 TB). The Seagate IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive has 256 MB more storage drive buffer size than the Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive (512 MB vs 256 MB). The Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive has 6 Gbit/s more HDD interface transfer rate than the Seagate IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive (12 Gbit/s vs 6 Gbit/s). Interface: Serial ATA III on the Seagate IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive, SAS on the Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive. Component for: NAS on the Seagate IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive, Disk array on the Seagate Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive.

  • HDD capacity
    • IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive:28 TB
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:8 TB
  • Interface
    • IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive:Serial ATA III
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:SAS
  • Component for
    • IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive:NAS
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:Disk array
  • Storage drive buffer size
    • IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive:512 MB
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:256 MB
  • HDD interface transfer rate
    • IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive:6 Gbit/s
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:12 Gbit/s
  • Mean time between failures (MTBF)
    • IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive:2500000 h
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:2000000 h
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive:8.3 W
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:12 W
  • Power consumption (idle)
    • IronWolf Pro ST28000NT000 internal hard drive:6.8 W
    • Enterprise ST8000NM0135-RF internal hard drive:8.5 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ST28000NT000, ST8000NM0135-RF
31 specifications
Features6 differ
HDD capacityDiffers28 TB8 TB
HDD speed7200 RPM7200 RPM
HDD size3.5"3.5"
InterfaceDiffersSerial ATA IIISAS
TypeHDDHDD
Component forDiffersNASDisk array
Storage drive buffer sizeDiffers512 MB256 MB
HDD interface transfer rateDiffers6 Gbit/s12 Gbit/s
HDD average transfer rateKnown for one270 MB/sUnknown — not stated by the source
24/7 operationYesYes
Workload rate limitKnown for one550 TB/yearUnknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs2500000 h2000000 h
Average latencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.16 ms
Rotational Vibration (RV) sensorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
RefurbishedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs8.3 W12 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one1.2 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (idle)Differs6.8 W8.5 W
Operating voltage5 / 12 V5 / 12 V
Start-up currentKnown for one2 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs10 - 60 °C5 - 60 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 70 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating vibrationKnown for one2.27 GUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating shockDiffers30 G70 G
Non-operating shockDiffers200 G250 G
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width101.8 mm101.8 mm
Depth147 mm147 mm
Height26.1 mm26.1 mm
WeightDiffers695 g780 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one5 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons