Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Seagate Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive vs Seagate Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive

19specifications compared
10differ
9identical
9known for one product only

Key differences

The Seagate Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive has 26 TB more HDD capacity than the Seagate Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive (28 TB vs 2 TB). The Seagate Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive has 384 MB more storage drive buffer size than the Seagate Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive (512 MB vs 128 MB). The Seagate Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive has 45 MiB/s more HDD sustained transfer rate than the Seagate Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive (226 MiB/s vs 181 MiB/s). Interface: Serial ATA III on the Seagate Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive, Serial ATA on the Seagate Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive. Component for: NAS on the Seagate Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive, PC on the Seagate Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive.

HDD capacity
- Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive:2 TB
- Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive:28 TB
Interface
- Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive:Serial ATA III
- Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive:Serial ATA
Component for
- Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive:NAS
- Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive:PC
Storage drive buffer size
- Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive:128 MB
- Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive:512 MB
HDD sustained transfer rate
- Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive:226 MiB/s
- Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive:181 MiB/s
Power consumption (idle)
- Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive:4.25 W
- Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive:6.7 W
Operating temperature (T-T)
- Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive:5 - 60 °C
- Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive:10 - 60 °C
Operating shock
- Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive:70 G
- Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive:30 G

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ST2000NM0125-RF, ST28000NM000C
28 specifications	A Seagate Enterprise ST2000NM0125-RF internal hard drive Model ST2000NM0125-RF View product	B Seagate Exos ST28000NM000C internal hard drive Model ST28000NM000C View product
Features5 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	2 TB	28 TB
HDD speed	7200 RPM	7200 RPM
HDD size	3.5"	3.5"
InterfaceDiffers	Serial ATA III	Serial ATA
Type	HDD	HDD
Component forDiffers	NAS	PC
Storage drive buffer sizeDiffers	128 MB	512 MB
HDD interface transfer rate	6 Gbit/s	6 Gbit/s
HDD sustained transfer rateDiffers	226 MiB/s	181 MiB/s
Average latencyKnown for one	4.16 ms	Unknown — not stated by the source
RefurbishedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	2000000 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDD average transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	190 MB/s
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	5.9 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (idle)Differs	4.25 W	6.7 W
Operating voltage	5 / 12 V	5 / 12 V
Power consumption (read)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10.5 W
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	5 - 60 °C	10 - 60 °C
Operating shockDiffers	70 G	30 G
Non-operating shockDiffers	300 G	200 G
Non-operating vibrationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.27 G
Packaging contentidentical
Storage drive adapter includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width	101.8 mm	101.8 mm
Depth	147 mm	147 mm
Height	26.1 mm	26.1 mm
WeightDiffers	610 g	695 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per pack	1 pc(s)	1 pc(s)
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	84717050	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons