Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Seagate IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive vs Seagate ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive

23specifications compared
10differ
13identical
8known for one product only

Key differences

The Seagate IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive has 6 TB more HDD capacity than the Seagate ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive (10 TB vs 4 TB). The Seagate IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive has 128 MB more storage drive buffer size than the Seagate ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive (256 MB vs 128 MB). The Seagate ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive has 189.49 MiB/s more HDD sustained transfer rate than the Seagate IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive (215 MiB/s vs 25.51 MiB/s). Interface: Serial ATA III on the Seagate IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive, SAS on the Seagate ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive. Quantity per pack: 1 pc(s) on the Seagate IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive, 20 pc(s) on the Seagate ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive.

HDD capacity
- IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:10 TB
- ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive:4 TB
Interface
- IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:Serial ATA III
- ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive:SAS
Storage drive buffer size
- IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:256 MB
- ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive:128 MB
HDD sustained transfer rate
- IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:25.51 MiB/s
- ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive:215 MiB/s
Mean time between failures (MTBF)
- IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:1200000 h
- ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive:2000000 h
Power consumption (typical)
- IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:7.8 W
- ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive:10.5 W
Power consumption (idle)
- IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:5 W
- ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive:6.7 W
Non-operating vibration
- IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:2.27 G
- ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive:5 G

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ST10000NE0004-RF, ST4000NM0025-RF
31 specifications	A Seagate IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive Model ST10000NE0004-RF View product	B Seagate ST4000NM0025-RF internal hard drive Model ST4000NM0025-RF View product
Features5 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	10 TB	4 TB
HDD speed	7200 RPM	7200 RPM
HDD size	3.5"	3.5"
InterfaceDiffers	Serial ATA III	SAS
Type	HDD	HDD
Component forKnown for one	NAS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage drive buffer sizeDiffers	256 MB	128 MB
HDD interface transfer rateKnown for one	6 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDD sustained transfer rateDiffers	25.51 MiB/s	215 MiB/s
Average latency	4.16 ms	4.16 ms
Refurbished	Yes	Yes
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs	1200000 h	2000000 h
Bytes per sectorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	512
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	7.8 W	10.5 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	0.8 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one	0.8 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (idle)Differs	5 W	6.7 W
Operating voltage	5 / 12 V	5 / 12 V
Start-up currentKnown for one	2 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)	5 - 60 °C	5 - 60 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-40 - 70 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating vibrationDiffers	2.27 G	5 G
Operating shock	70 G	70 G
Non-operating shock	250 G	250 G
Packaging contentidentical
Storage drive adapter includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width	101.8 mm	101.8 mm
Depth	147 mm	147 mm
Height	26.1 mm	26.1 mm
WeightDiffers	705 g	655 g
Packaging data1 differ
Quantity per packDiffers	1 pc(s)	20 pc(s)
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) code	84717050	84717050

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons