Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Seagate IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive vs Seagate Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 5identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

The Seagate IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive has 8.2 TB more HDD capacity than the Seagate Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive (10 TB vs 1.8 TB). The Seagate Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive has 2,800 RPM more HDD speed than the Seagate IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive (10000 RPM vs 7200 RPM). The Seagate IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive has 1" more HDD size than the Seagate Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive (3.5" vs 2.5"). Interface: Serial ATA III on the Seagate IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive, SAS on the Seagate Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive. Operating voltage: 5 / 12 V on the Seagate IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive, 5 V on the Seagate Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive.

  • HDD capacity
    • IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:10 TB
    • Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive:1.8 TB
  • HDD speed
    • IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:7200 RPM
    • Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive:10000 RPM
  • HDD size
    • IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:3.5"
    • Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive:2.5"
  • Interface
    • IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:Serial ATA III
    • Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive:SAS
  • Storage drive buffer size
    • IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:256 MB
    • Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive:128 MB
  • HDD interface transfer rate
    • IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:6 Gbit/s
    • Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive:12 Gbit/s
  • Average latency
    • IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:4.16 ms
    • Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive:2.9 ms
  • Power consumption (idle)
    • IronWolf Pro ST10000NE0004-RF internal hard drive:5 W
    • Enterprise ST1800MM0018-RF internal hard drive:4.55 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ST10000NE0004-RF, ST1800MM0018-RF
31 specifications
Features7 differ
HDD capacityDiffers10 TB1.8 TB
HDD speedDiffers7200 RPM10000 RPM
HDD sizeDiffers3.5"2.5"
InterfaceDiffersSerial ATA IIISAS
TypeHDDHDD
Component forKnown for oneNASUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage drive buffer sizeDiffers256 MB128 MB
HDD interface transfer rateDiffers6 Gbit/s12 Gbit/s
HDD sustained transfer rateKnown for one25.51 MiB/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Average latencyDiffers4.16 ms2.9 ms
RefurbishedYesYes
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one1200000 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)7.8 W7.8 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one0.8 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one0.8 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (idle)Differs5 W4.55 W
Operating voltageDiffers5 / 12 V5 V
Start-up currentKnown for one2 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions4 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs5 - 60 °C5 - 55 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)-40 - 70 °C-40 - 70 °C
Non-operating vibrationDiffers2.27 G0.5 G
Operating shockDiffers70 G40 G
Non-operating shockDiffers250 G400 G
Operating vibrationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.1 G
Packaging contentidentical
Storage drive adapter includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers101.8 mm70.1 mm
DepthDiffers147 mm100.5 mm
HeightDiffers26.1 mm15 mm
WeightDiffers705 g199 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one84717050Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons