Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Seagate FireCuda 2.5" vs Seagate IronWolf ST7000VN0002 internal hard drive

22specifications compared
17differ
5identical
13known for one product only

Key differences

HDD capacity
- FireCuda 2.5":500 GB
- IronWolf ST7000VN0002 internal hard drive:7 TB
HDD speed
- FireCuda 2.5":5400 RPM
- IronWolf ST7000VN0002 internal hard drive:7200 RPM
HDD size
- FireCuda 2.5":2.5"
- IronWolf ST7000VN0002 internal hard drive:3.5"
Type
- FireCuda 2.5":Hybrid-HDD
- IronWolf ST7000VN0002 internal hard drive:HDD
Storage drive buffer size
- FireCuda 2.5":128 MB
- IronWolf ST7000VN0002 internal hard drive:256 MB
HDD sustained transfer rate
- FireCuda 2.5":140 MiB/s
- IronWolf ST7000VN0002 internal hard drive:210 MiB/s
Average latency
- FireCuda 2.5":5.6 ms
- IronWolf ST7000VN0002 internal hard drive:4 ms
Operating voltage
- FireCuda 2.5":5 V
- IronWolf ST7000VN0002 internal hard drive:5 / 12 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FireCuda 2.5", ST7000VN0002
35 specifications	A Seagate FireCuda 2.5"View product	B Seagate IronWolf ST7000VN0002 internal hard drive Model ST7000VN0002 View product
Features7 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	500 GB	7 TB
HDD speedDiffers	5400 RPM	7200 RPM
HDD sizeDiffers	2.5"	3.5"
Interface	Serial ATA III	Serial ATA III
TypeDiffers	Hybrid-HDD	HDD
Storage drive buffer sizeDiffers	128 MB	256 MB
HDD interface transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6 Gbit/s
HDD sustained transfer rateDiffers	140 MiB/s	210 MiB/s
HDD number of headsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12
Read seek timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8.5 ms
Write seek timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	9.5 ms
Average latencyDiffers	5.6 ms	4 ms
Bytes per sector	4096	4096
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000000 h
SMART technologyKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	9 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.6 W
Operating voltageDiffers	5 V	5 / 12 V
Start-up currentDiffers	1 A	2 A
Power consumption (idle)Known for one	0.45 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (read)Known for one	1.6 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (write)Known for one	1.7 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions4 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 60 °C	5 - 70 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)	-40 - 70 °C	-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	5 - 95%	5 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)	5 - 95%	5 - 95%
Operating shockDiffers	400 G	70 G
Non-operating shockDiffers	1000 G	250 G
Packaging contentidentical
Storage drive adapter included	No	No
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	69.8 mm	101.6 mm
DepthDiffers	100.3 mm	147 mm
HeightDiffers	7 mm	26.1 mm
WeightDiffers	92 g	780 g
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	84717050	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	RoHS	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons