Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Iomega REV 35GB ATAPI vs Seagate 60GB 2.5" Ultra ATA/100

5specifications compared
5differ
0identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

The Seagate 60GB 2.5" Ultra ATA/100 has 25 GB more HDD capacity than the Iomega REV 35GB ATAPI (60 GB vs 35 GB). The Iomega REV 35GB ATAPI has 1" more HDD size than the Seagate 60GB 2.5" Ultra ATA/100 (3.5" vs 2.5"). The Iomega REV 35GB ATAPI has 750 g more weight than the Seagate 60GB 2.5" Ultra ATA/100 (850 g vs 100 g). Interface: IDE/ATA on the Iomega REV 35GB ATAPI, Ultra-ATA/100 on the Seagate 60GB 2.5" Ultra ATA/100. Operating voltage: 5 / 12 V on the Iomega REV 35GB ATAPI, 5 V on the Seagate 60GB 2.5" Ultra ATA/100.

HDD capacity
- REV 35GB ATAPI:35 GB
- 60GB 2.5" Ultra ATA/100:60 GB
HDD size
- REV 35GB ATAPI:3.5"
- 60GB 2.5" Ultra ATA/100:2.5"
Interface
- REV 35GB ATAPI:IDE/ATA
- 60GB 2.5" Ultra ATA/100:Ultra-ATA/100
Operating voltage
- REV 35GB ATAPI:5 / 12 V
- 60GB 2.5" Ultra ATA/100:5 V
Weight
- REV 35GB ATAPI:850 g
- 60GB 2.5" Ultra ATA/100:100 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of REV 35GB ATAPI, 60GB 2.5" Ultra ATA/100
30 specifications	A Iomega REV 35GB ATAPI View product	B Seagate 60GB 2.5" Ultra ATA/100 View product
Features3 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	35 GB	60 GB
HDD speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5400 RPM
HDD sizeDiffers	3.5"	2.5"
InterfaceDiffers	IDE/ATA	Ultra-ATA/100
TypeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	HDD
Component forKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Laptop
Storage drive buffer sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8 MB
HDD number of headsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Average seek timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12.5 ms
Average latencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.6 ms
Write seek timeKnown for one	13 ms	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.26 W
Power consumption (idle)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.8 W
Power consumption (read)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.8 W
Power consumption (write)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.8 W
Operating voltageDiffers	5 / 12 V	5 V
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 55 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 70 °C
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	69.8 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100.2 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	9.5 mm
WeightDiffers	850 g	100 g
Other featuresidentical
Minimum system requirementsKnown for one	CD-ROM Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	146 x 101.4 x 25.4 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Microsoft Windows 2000/XP Home / Pro, Server 2003 (Standard Edition), 2000 Professional Server & Advanced Server (SP 3 & 4)	Unknown — not stated by the source
InternalKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum RAMKnown for one	128 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum processorKnown for one	333 MHz Pentium II	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum storage drive spaceKnown for one	100 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compressed capacityKnown for one	90 GB	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons