Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Hypertec 500GB 2.5" SATA vs Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI

7specifications compared
5differ
2identical
1known for one product only

Key differences

The Hypertec 500GB 2.5" SATA has 427 GB more HDD capacity than the Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI (500 GB vs 73 GB). The Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI has 7,800 RPM more HDD speed than the Hypertec 500GB 2.5" SATA (15000 RPM vs 7200 RPM). The Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI has 1" more HDD size than the Hypertec 500GB 2.5" SATA (3.5" vs 2.5"). Interface: Serial ATA on the Hypertec 500GB 2.5" SATA, Ultra160 SCSI on the Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI. Operating voltage: 5 V on the Hypertec 500GB 2.5" SATA, 5 / 12 V on the Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI.

HDD capacity
- 500GB 2.5" SATA:500 GB
- 73GB Ultra160 SCSI:73 GB
HDD speed
- 500GB 2.5" SATA:7200 RPM
- 73GB Ultra160 SCSI:15000 RPM
HDD size
- 500GB 2.5" SATA:2.5"
- 73GB Ultra160 SCSI:3.5"
Interface
- 500GB 2.5" SATA:Serial ATA
- 73GB Ultra160 SCSI:Ultra160 SCSI
Operating voltage
- 500GB 2.5" SATA:5 V
- 73GB Ultra160 SCSI:5 / 12 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 500GB 2.5" SATA, 73GB Ultra160 SCSI
8 specifications	A Hypertec 500GB 2.5" SATA View product	B Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI View product
Features4 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	500 GB	73 GB
HDD speedDiffers	7200 RPM	15000 RPM
HDD sizeDiffers	2.5"	3.5"
InterfaceDiffers	Serial ATA	Ultra160 SCSI
Power1 differ
Operating voltageDiffers	5 V	5 / 12 V
Other featuresidentical
Drive device, transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160 MB/s
Internal	Yes	Yes
USB powered	No	No

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons