Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Hypertec 300GB SAS Dual Port vs Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI

7specifications compared
5differ
2identical
2known for one product only

Key differences

The Hypertec 300GB SAS Dual Port has 227 GB more HDD capacity than the Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI (300 GB vs 73 GB). The Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI has 5,000 RPM more HDD speed than the Hypertec 300GB SAS Dual Port (15000 RPM vs 10000 RPM). The Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI has 1" more HDD size than the Hypertec 300GB SAS Dual Port (3.5" vs 2.5"). Interface: SAS on the Hypertec 300GB SAS Dual Port, Ultra160 SCSI on the Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI. Operating voltage: 5 V on the Hypertec 300GB SAS Dual Port, 5 / 12 V on the Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI.

HDD capacity
- 300GB SAS Dual Port:300 GB
- 73GB Ultra160 SCSI:73 GB
HDD speed
- 300GB SAS Dual Port:10000 RPM
- 73GB Ultra160 SCSI:15000 RPM
HDD size
- 300GB SAS Dual Port:2.5"
- 73GB Ultra160 SCSI:3.5"
Interface
- 300GB SAS Dual Port:SAS
- 73GB Ultra160 SCSI:Ultra160 SCSI
Operating voltage
- 300GB SAS Dual Port:5 V
- 73GB Ultra160 SCSI:5 / 12 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 300GB SAS Dual Port, 73GB Ultra160 SCSI
9 specifications	A Hypertec 300GB SAS Dual Port View product	B Hypertec 73GB Ultra160 SCSI View product
Features4 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	300 GB	73 GB
HDD speedDiffers	10000 RPM	15000 RPM
HDD sizeDiffers	2.5"	3.5"
InterfaceDiffers	SAS	Ultra160 SCSI
Component forKnown for one	Server/workstation	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Operating voltageDiffers	5 V	5 / 12 V
Other featuresidentical
Internal	Yes	Yes
USB powered	No	No
Drive device, transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160 MB/s

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons