Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

HP 160GB SATAII 7200rpm vs Hypertec 300GB SAS LFF

6specifications compared
3differ
3identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

The Hypertec 300GB SAS LFF has 140 GB more HDD capacity than the HP 160GB SATAII 7200rpm (300 GB vs 160 GB). The Hypertec 300GB SAS LFF has 7,800 RPM more HDD speed than the HP 160GB SATAII 7200rpm (15000 RPM vs 7200 RPM). Interface: Serial ATA II on the HP 160GB SATAII 7200rpm, SAS on the Hypertec 300GB SAS LFF.

HDD capacity
- 160GB SATAII 7200rpm:160 GB
- 300GB SAS LFF:300 GB
HDD speed
- 160GB SATAII 7200rpm:7200 RPM
- 300GB SAS LFF:15000 RPM
Interface
- 160GB SATAII 7200rpm:Serial ATA II
- 300GB SAS LFF:SAS

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 160GB SATAII 7200rpm, 300GB SAS LFF
10 specifications	A HP 160GB SATAII 7200rpm View product	B Hypertec 300GB SAS LFF View product
Features3 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	160 GB	300 GB
HDD speedDiffers	7200 RPM	15000 RPM
InterfaceDiffers	Serial ATA II	SAS
Other featuresidentical
Data transfer rateKnown for one	3 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible productsKnown for one	HP Z600 Workstation	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3000 Mbit/s
USB poweredKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons