Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

HP 160GB, SATA, 3Gb/s, NCQ, 7200rpm vs Seagate ST18 ATA 60-GB

Add a product
  • 4specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 1identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

The HP 160GB, SATA, 3Gb/s, NCQ, 7200rpm has 100 GB more HDD capacity than the Seagate ST18 ATA 60-GB (160 GB vs 60 GB). The HP 160GB, SATA, 3Gb/s, NCQ, 7200rpm has 1.7" more HDD size than the Seagate ST18 ATA 60-GB (3.5" vs 1.8"). Operating voltage: 5 / 12 V on the HP 160GB, SATA, 3Gb/s, NCQ, 7200rpm, 3.3 V on the Seagate ST18 ATA 60-GB.

  • HDD capacity
    • 160GB, SATA, 3Gb/s, NCQ, 7200rpm:160 GB
    • ST18 ATA 60-GB:60 GB
  • HDD size
    • 160GB, SATA, 3Gb/s, NCQ, 7200rpm:3.5"
    • ST18 ATA 60-GB:1.8"
  • Operating voltage
    • 160GB, SATA, 3Gb/s, NCQ, 7200rpm:5 / 12 V
    • ST18 ATA 60-GB:3.3 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 160GB, SATA, 3Gb/s, NCQ, 7200rpm, ST18 ATA 60-GB
16 specifications
Features2 differ
HDD capacityDiffers160 GB60 GB
HDD speedKnown for one7200 RPMUnknown — not stated by the source
HDD sizeDiffers3.5"1.8"
InterfaceKnown for oneSerial ATAUnknown — not stated by the source
TypeKnown for oneHDDUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage drive buffer sizeKnown for one8 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
HDD interface transfer rateKnown for one3 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Average latencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8.3 ms
Power1 differ
Operating voltageDiffers5 / 12 V3.3 V
Other featuresidentical
Data transfer rateKnown for one3 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Compatible productsKnown for onexw4600Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source54.3 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source71.3 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.15 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source48 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons