Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

HP 146GB, U320 SCSI, 10K Rpm vs HP 60 GB, 5400rpm, Multibay I Adapter (12.7mm)

Add a product
  • 5specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 2identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

The HP 146GB, U320 SCSI, 10K Rpm has 86 GB more HDD capacity than the HP 60 GB, 5400rpm, Multibay I Adapter (12.7mm) (146 GB vs 60 GB). The HP 146GB, U320 SCSI, 10K Rpm has 4,600 RPM more HDD speed than the HP 60 GB, 5400rpm, Multibay I Adapter (12.7mm) (10000 RPM vs 5400 RPM). Interface: Ultra320 SCSI on the HP 146GB, U320 SCSI, 10K Rpm, Serial ATA on the HP 60 GB, 5400rpm, Multibay I Adapter (12.7mm).

  • HDD capacity
    • 146GB, U320 SCSI, 10K Rpm:146 GB
    • 60 GB, 5400rpm, Multibay I Adapter (12.7mm):60 GB
  • HDD speed
    • 146GB, U320 SCSI, 10K Rpm:10000 RPM
    • 60 GB, 5400rpm, Multibay I Adapter (12.7mm):5400 RPM
  • Interface
    • 146GB, U320 SCSI, 10K Rpm:Ultra320 SCSI
    • 60 GB, 5400rpm, Multibay I Adapter (12.7mm):Serial ATA

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 146GB, U320 SCSI, 10K Rpm, 60 GB, 5400rpm, Multibay I Adapter (12.7mm)
13 specifications
Features3 differ
HDD capacityDiffers146 GB60 GB
HDD speedDiffers10000 RPM5400 RPM
HDD sizeKnown for one3.5"Unknown — not stated by the source
InterfaceDiffersUltra320 SCSISerial ATA
TypeHDDHDD
Component forKnown for oneServer/workstationUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage drive buffer sizeKnown for one8 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Full stroke seek timeKnown for one9.2 msUnknown — not stated by the source
Average seek timeKnown for one4.9 msUnknown — not stated by the source
SMART technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
Operating voltageKnown for one5 / 12 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
InternalYesYes
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one320 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons