Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Fujitsu MBC2073RC internal hard drive vs HP 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm

11specifications compared
8differ
3identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The Fujitsu MBC2073RC internal hard drive has 7,800 RPM more HDD speed than the HP 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm (15000 RPM vs 7200 RPM). The HP 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm has 1" more HDD size than the Fujitsu MBC2073RC internal hard drive (3.5" vs 2.5"). The HP 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm has 31.9 mm more width than the Fujitsu MBC2073RC internal hard drive (101.7 mm vs 69.8 mm). HDD capacity: 73.5 GB on the Fujitsu MBC2073RC internal hard drive, 1 TB on the HP 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm. Interface: SAS on the Fujitsu MBC2073RC internal hard drive, Serial ATA II on the HP 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm.

HDD capacity
- MBC2073RC internal hard drive:73.5 GB
- 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm:1 TB
HDD speed
- MBC2073RC internal hard drive:15000 RPM
- 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm:7200 RPM
HDD size
- MBC2073RC internal hard drive:2.5"
- 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm:3.5"
Interface
- MBC2073RC internal hard drive:SAS
- 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm:Serial ATA II
Operating voltage
- MBC2073RC internal hard drive:5 V
- 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm:5 / 12 V
Width
- MBC2073RC internal hard drive:69.8 mm
- 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm:101.7 mm
Height
- MBC2073RC internal hard drive:15 mm
- 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm:25.4 mm
Weight
- MBC2073RC internal hard drive:220 g
- 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm:630 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of MBC2073RC, 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm
31 specifications	A Fujitsu MBC2073RC internal hard drive Model MBC2073RC View product	B HP 1TB, SATA, 3.0G, NCQ, 7200 rpm View product
Features4 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	73.5 GB	1 TB
HDD speedDiffers	15000 RPM	7200 RPM
HDD sizeDiffers	2.5"	3.5"
InterfaceDiffers	SAS	Serial ATA II
Storage drive buffer sizeKnown for one	16 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDD number of headsKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Read seek timeKnown for one	0.2 ms	Unknown — not stated by the source
Write seek timeKnown for one	0.4 ms	Unknown — not stated by the source
Average latencyKnown for one	2.00 ms	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bytes per sectorKnown for one	512	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	1400000 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Native Command Queuing (NCQ)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Operating voltageDiffers	5 V	5 / 12 V
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	5 - 55 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-40 - 70 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating shockKnown for one	100 G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating shockKnown for one	400 G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	69.8 mm	101.7 mm
DepthKnown for one	100.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightDiffers	15 mm	25.4 mm
WeightDiffers	220 g	630 g
Other featuresidentical
Data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 Gbit/s
InternalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Size (imperial)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10.2 cm (4")
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Compatible productsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	HP xw4600 Workstation HP xw6600 Workstation HP xw8600 Workstation HP xw9400 Workstation HP Z200 Small Form Factor Workstation HP Z200 Workstation HP Z210 Convertible Minitower Workstation HP Z210 Small Form Factor Workstation HP Z400 Workstation HP Z600 Workstation HP Z800 Workstation

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons