Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Fujitsu MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL vs Seagate SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 7identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

The Seagate SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk has 246.5 GB more HDD capacity than the Fujitsu MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL (320 GB vs 73.5 GB). The Fujitsu MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL has 7,800 RPM more HDD speed than the Seagate SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk (15000 RPM vs 7200 RPM). The Seagate SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk has 0.8 ms more track to track seek time than the Fujitsu MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL (1 ms vs 0.2 ms). Operating temperature (T-T): 5 - 55 °C on the Fujitsu MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL, 0 - 60 °C on the Seagate SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk. Operating relative humidity (H-H): 5 - 95% on the Fujitsu MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL, 5 - 90% on the Seagate SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk.

  • HDD capacity
    • MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL:73.5 GB
    • SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk:320 GB
  • HDD speed
    • MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL:15000 RPM
    • SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk:7200 RPM
  • Track to track seek time
    • MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL:0.2 ms
    • SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk:1 ms
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL:5 - 55 °C
    • SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk:0 - 60 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL:5 - 95%
    • SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk:5 - 90%
  • Operating shock
    • MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL:65 G
    • SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk:63 G
  • Non-operating shock
    • MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL:250 G
    • SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk:300 G
  • Depth
    • MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL:146 mm
    • SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk:147 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of MBA3073FD - 73GB Hard Disk Drive, FCAL, SV35 Series 7200.2 320GB SATA II 20pk
32 specifications
Features3 differ
HDD capacityDiffers73.5 GB320 GB
HDD speedDiffers15000 RPM7200 RPM
HDD size3.5"3.5"
InterfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSerial ATA II
Component forKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSurveillance system
Storage drive buffer size16 MB16 MB
Read seek timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source17 ms
Write seek timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source14 ms
Track to track seek timeDiffers0.2 ms1 ms
Bytes per sectorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source512
Start/stop cyclesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50000
HDD number of cylindersKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
HDD number of headsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Average latencyKnown for one2 msUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Operating voltage5 / 12 V5 / 12 V
Power consumption (typical)Known for one14.8 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions4 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs5 - 55 °C0 - 60 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)-40 - 70 °C-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs5 - 95%5 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)5 - 95%5 - 95%
Operating shockDiffers65 G63 G
Non-operating shockDiffers250 G300 G
Operating altitudeKnown for one0 - 3048 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating altitudeKnown for one0 - 12192 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width101.6 mm101.6 mm
DepthDiffers146 mm147 mm
HeightDiffers25.4 mm26.1 mm
WeightDiffers750 g600 g
Other features1 differ
Power requirementsDiffers5 V ± 5%, 12 V ± 5%+5V; +12V
Data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 Gbit/s
Drive ready timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7 s
InternalYesYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons