Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Fujitsu MAU3073FC internal hard drive vs Fujitsu MHT2060BS internal hard drive

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 2identical
  • 3known for one product only

Key differences

  • HDD capacity
    • MAU3073FC internal hard drive:73.5 GB
    • MHT2060BS internal hard drive:60 GB
  • HDD speed
    • MAU3073FC internal hard drive:15000 RPM
    • MHT2060BS internal hard drive:5400 RPM
  • HDD size
    • MAU3073FC internal hard drive:3.5"
    • MHT2060BS internal hard drive:2.5"
  • Interface
    • MAU3073FC internal hard drive:Fibre Channel
    • MHT2060BS internal hard drive:Serial ATA
  • HDD interface transfer rate
    • MAU3073FC internal hard drive:2 Gbit/s
    • MHT2060BS internal hard drive:1.5 Gbit/s
  • Operating voltage
    • MAU3073FC internal hard drive:5 / 12 V
    • MHT2060BS internal hard drive:5 V
  • Width
    • MAU3073FC internal hard drive:101.6 mm
    • MHT2060BS internal hard drive:70 mm
  • Depth
    • MAU3073FC internal hard drive:146 mm
    • MHT2060BS internal hard drive:100 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of MAU3073FC, MHT2060BS
15 specifications
Features5 differ
HDD capacityDiffers73.5 GB60 GB
HDD speedDiffers15000 RPM5400 RPM
HDD sizeDiffers3.5"2.5"
InterfaceDiffersFibre ChannelSerial ATA
TypeHDDHDD
Storage drive buffer size8 MB8 MB
HDD interface transfer rateDiffers2 Gbit/s1.5 Gbit/s
HDD sustained transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source150 MiB/s
Average seek timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 ms
Component forKnown for oneServer/workstationUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Operating voltageDiffers5 / 12 V5 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers101.6 mm70 mm
DepthDiffers146 mm100 mm
HeightDiffers25.4 mm95 mm
WeightDiffers750 g99 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons