Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Fujitsu HD SATA 3GB/s 500GB 7.2k hot pl 3.5" vs Seagate 160GB 2.5" SATA

5specifications compared
4differ
1identical
27known for one product only

Key differences

The Fujitsu HD SATA 3GB/s 500GB 7.2k hot pl 3.5" has 340 GB more HDD capacity than the Seagate 160GB 2.5" SATA (500 GB vs 160 GB). The Fujitsu HD SATA 3GB/s 500GB 7.2k hot pl 3.5" has 1,800 RPM more HDD speed than the Seagate 160GB 2.5" SATA (7200 RPM vs 5400 RPM). The Fujitsu HD SATA 3GB/s 500GB 7.2k hot pl 3.5" has 1" more HDD size than the Seagate 160GB 2.5" SATA (3.5" vs 2.5"). Operating voltage: 5 / 12 V on the Fujitsu HD SATA 3GB/s 500GB 7.2k hot pl 3.5", 5 V on the Seagate 160GB 2.5" SATA.

HDD capacity
- HD SATA 3GB/s 500GB 7.2k hot pl 3.5":500 GB
- 160GB 2.5" SATA:160 GB
HDD speed
- HD SATA 3GB/s 500GB 7.2k hot pl 3.5":7200 RPM
- 160GB 2.5" SATA:5400 RPM
HDD size
- HD SATA 3GB/s 500GB 7.2k hot pl 3.5":3.5"
- 160GB 2.5" SATA:2.5"
Operating voltage
- HD SATA 3GB/s 500GB 7.2k hot pl 3.5":5 / 12 V
- 160GB 2.5" SATA:5 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of HD SATA 3GB/s 500GB 7.2k hot pl 3.5", 160GB 2.5" SATA
32 specifications	A Fujitsu HD SATA 3GB/s 500GB 7.2k hot pl 3.5"View product	B Seagate 160GB 2.5" SATA View product
Features3 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	500 GB	160 GB
HDD speedDiffers	7200 RPM	5400 RPM
HDD sizeDiffers	3.5"	2.5"
TypeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	HDD
Component forKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Laptop
Storage drive buffer sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8 MB
HDD number of headsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4
Read seek timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12.5 ms
Write seek timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	13 ms
Average latencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.6 ms
Power1 differ
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.2 W
Power consumption (idle)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.6 W
Power consumption (read)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.9 W
Power consumption (write)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.8 W
Operating voltageDiffers	5 / 12 V	5 V
Start-up currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 A
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 60 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%
Operating altitudeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-60.96 - 3048 m
Non-operating altitudeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-60.96 - 12192 m
Operating shockKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	350 G
Non-operating shockKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	900 G
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	69.8 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100.5 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	9.5 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 g
Other featuresidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
InternalKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons