All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Fujitsu 320GB 5400 rpm SATA vs HP 160GB 3.5" 7200 rpm SATA II

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 3identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

The Fujitsu 320GB 5400 rpm SATA has 160 GB more HDD capacity than the HP 160GB 3.5" 7200 rpm SATA II (320 GB vs 160 GB). The HP 160GB 3.5" 7200 rpm SATA II has 1,800 RPM more HDD speed than the Fujitsu 320GB 5400 rpm SATA (7200 RPM vs 5400 RPM). Interface: Serial ATA on the Fujitsu 320GB 5400 rpm SATA, Serial ATA II on the HP 160GB 3.5" 7200 rpm SATA II.

  • HDD capacity
    • 320 GB
    • 160 GB
  • HDD speed
    • 5400 RPM
    • 7200 RPM
  • Interface
    • Serial ATA
    • Serial ATA II

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
15 specifications
A

Fujitsu

320GB 5400 rpm SATAView product
B

HP

160GB 3.5" 7200 rpm SATA IIView product
Features3 differ
HDD capacityDiffers320 GB160 GB
HDD speedDiffers5400 RPM7200 RPM
HDD sizeKnown for one3.5"
InterfaceDiffersSerial ATASerial ATA II
Component forKnown for onePC
Storage drive buffer sizeKnown for one8 MB
Poweridentical
Operating voltageKnown for one5 / 12 V
Other featuresidentical
Data transfer rateKnown for one3 Gbit/s
InternalYesYes
Windows operating systems supportedYesYes
Linux operating systems supportedYesYes
Compatible productsKnown for oneHP Compaq dc7700
Number of products includedKnown for one1 pc(s)
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one5 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons