Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Fujitsu 300GB 15krpm SAS 2.5" vs Fujitsu FTS:ETFNC2-L internal hard drive

7specifications compared
5differ
2identical
2known for one product only

Key differences

The Fujitsu 300GB 15krpm SAS 2.5" has 7,800 RPM more HDD speed than the Fujitsu FTS:ETFNC2-L internal hard drive (15000 RPM vs 7200 RPM). The Fujitsu FTS:ETFNC2-L internal hard drive has 1" more HDD size than the Fujitsu 300GB 15krpm SAS 2.5" (3.5" vs 2.5"). HDD capacity: 300 GB on the Fujitsu 300GB 15krpm SAS 2.5", 2 TB on the Fujitsu FTS:ETFNC2-L internal hard drive. Interface: SAS on the Fujitsu 300GB 15krpm SAS 2.5", NL-SAS on the Fujitsu FTS:ETFNC2-L internal hard drive. Operating voltage: 5 V on the Fujitsu 300GB 15krpm SAS 2.5", 5 / 12 V on the Fujitsu FTS:ETFNC2-L internal hard drive.

HDD capacity
- 300GB 15krpm SAS 2.5":300 GB
- FTS:ETFNC2-L internal hard drive:2 TB
HDD speed
- 300GB 15krpm SAS 2.5":15000 RPM
- FTS:ETFNC2-L internal hard drive:7200 RPM
HDD size
- 300GB 15krpm SAS 2.5":2.5"
- FTS:ETFNC2-L internal hard drive:3.5"
Interface
- 300GB 15krpm SAS 2.5":SAS
- FTS:ETFNC2-L internal hard drive:NL-SAS
Operating voltage
- 300GB 15krpm SAS 2.5":5 V
- FTS:ETFNC2-L internal hard drive:5 / 12 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 300GB 15krpm SAS 2.5", FTS:ETFNC2-L
9 specifications	A Fujitsu 300GB 15krpm SAS 2.5"View product	B Fujitsu FTS:ETFNC2-L internal hard drive Model FTS:ETFNC2-L View product
Features4 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	300 GB	2 TB
HDD speedDiffers	15000 RPM	7200 RPM
HDD sizeDiffers	2.5"	3.5"
InterfaceDiffers	SAS	NL-SAS
Type	HDD	HDD
Component for	Server/workstation	Server/workstation
Power1 differ
Operating voltageDiffers	5 V	5 / 12 V
Other featuresidentical
Compatible productsKnown for one	DX100 S3 / DX200 S3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons