Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Fujitsu 146GB 3.5" SCSI vs Iomega 160GB Hot-Swappable SATA

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 3identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

The Iomega 160GB Hot-Swappable SATA has 14 GB more HDD capacity than the Fujitsu 146GB 3.5" SCSI (160 GB vs 146 GB). The Fujitsu 146GB 3.5" SCSI has 2,800 RPM more HDD speed than the Iomega 160GB Hot-Swappable SATA (10000 RPM vs 7200 RPM). Interface: Ultra320 SCSI on the Fujitsu 146GB 3.5" SCSI, Serial ATA on the Iomega 160GB Hot-Swappable SATA.

  • HDD capacity
    • 146GB 3.5" SCSI:146 GB
    • 160GB Hot-Swappable SATA:160 GB
  • HDD speed
    • 146GB 3.5" SCSI:10000 RPM
    • 160GB Hot-Swappable SATA:7200 RPM
  • Interface
    • 146GB 3.5" SCSI:Ultra320 SCSI
    • 160GB Hot-Swappable SATA:Serial ATA

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 146GB 3.5" SCSI, 160GB Hot-Swappable SATA
15 specifications
Features3 differ
HDD capacityDiffers146 GB160 GB
HDD speedDiffers10000 RPM7200 RPM
InterfaceDiffersUltra320 SCSISerial ATA
Storage drive buffer sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 MB
HDD sizeKnown for one3.5"Unknown — not stated by the source
Component forKnown for oneServer/workstationUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
HDD transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source150 Mbit/s
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source132 x 152.4 x 25.4 mm
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Compatible productsKnown for onePRIMERGY TX150 S3, TX150 S4, TX 200 S2, TX300 S2, TX600, TX600 S2, RX200 S2, RX300 S2, RX600, RX600 S2, RX800Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Operating voltageKnown for one5 / 12 VUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons