Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

CoreParts IB250002I842 internal hard drive vs CoreParts IB750001I331 internal hard drive

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 9identical
  • 3known for one product only

Key differences

The CoreParts IB750001I331 internal hard drive has 500 GB more HDD capacity than the CoreParts IB250002I842 internal hard drive (750 GB vs 250 GB). The CoreParts IB250002I842 internal hard drive has 1,800 RPM more HDD speed than the CoreParts IB750001I331 internal hard drive (7200 RPM vs 5400 RPM). The CoreParts IB750001I331 internal hard drive has 180 g more weight than the CoreParts IB250002I842 internal hard drive (280 g vs 100 g).

  • HDD capacity
    • IB250002I842 internal hard drive:250 GB
    • IB750001I331 internal hard drive:750 GB
  • HDD speed
    • IB250002I842 internal hard drive:7200 RPM
    • IB750001I331 internal hard drive:5400 RPM
  • Weight
    • IB250002I842 internal hard drive:100 g
    • IB750001I331 internal hard drive:280 g
  • Package weight
    • IB250002I842 internal hard drive:200 g
    • IB750001I331 internal hard drive:300 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of IB250002I842, IB750001I331
16 specifications
Features2 differ
HDD capacityDiffers250 GB750 GB
HDD speedDiffers7200 RPM5400 RPM
InterfaceSerial ATASerial ATA
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width120 mm120 mm
Depth40 mm40 mm
Height100 mm100 mm
WeightDiffers100 g280 g
Packaging data1 differ
Package width120 mm120 mm
Package depth40 mm40 mm
Package weightDiffers200 g300 g
Package height100 mm100 mm
Other featuresidentical
InternalYesYes
MountingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHorizontal
Size (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source13.3 cm (5.25")
USB poweredNoNo
USB requiredKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons