Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM vs Hypertec 400GB 3.5" 10000rpm

5specifications compared
3differ
2identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

The Hypertec 400GB 3.5" 10000rpm has 80 GB more HDD capacity than the CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM (400 GB vs 320 GB). The Hypertec 400GB 3.5" 10000rpm has 4,600 RPM more HDD speed than the CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM (10000 RPM vs 5400 RPM). Interface: Serial ATA on the CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM, SAS on the Hypertec 400GB 3.5" 10000rpm.

HDD capacity
- 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM:320 GB
- 400GB 3.5" 10000rpm:400 GB
HDD speed
- 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM:5400 RPM
- 400GB 3.5" 10000rpm:10000 RPM
Interface
- 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM:Serial ATA
- 400GB 3.5" 10000rpm:SAS

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM, 400GB 3.5" 10000rpm
9 specifications	A CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM View product	B Hypertec 400GB 3.5" 10000rpm View product
Features3 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	320 GB	400 GB
HDD speedDiffers	5400 RPM	10000 RPM
InterfaceDiffers	Serial ATA	SAS
Component forKnown for one	Laptop	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDD sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5"
Other featuresidentical
Internal	Yes	Yes
USB powered	No	No
Compatible productsKnown for one	IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Operating voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 / 12 V

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons