Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM vs Hypertec 250GB UDMA HDD

5specifications compared
3differ
2identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

The CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM has 70 GB more HDD capacity than the Hypertec 250GB UDMA HDD (320 GB vs 250 GB). The Hypertec 250GB UDMA HDD has 1,800 RPM more HDD speed than the CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM (7200 RPM vs 5400 RPM). Interface: Serial ATA on the CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM, Ultra-ATA/66 on the Hypertec 250GB UDMA HDD.

HDD capacity
- 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM:320 GB
- 250GB UDMA HDD:250 GB
HDD speed
- 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM:5400 RPM
- 250GB UDMA HDD:7200 RPM
Interface
- 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM:Serial ATA
- 250GB UDMA HDD:Ultra-ATA/66

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM, 250GB UDMA HDD
9 specifications	A CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM View product	B Hypertec 250GB UDMA HDD View product
Features3 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	320 GB	250 GB
HDD speedDiffers	5400 RPM	7200 RPM
InterfaceDiffers	Serial ATA	Ultra-ATA/66
Component forKnown for one	Laptop	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDD sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5"
Other featuresidentical
Compatible productsKnown for one	IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Operating voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 / 12 V

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons