Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM vs Hypertec 160GB PATA HDD

5specifications compared
2differ
3identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

The CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM has 160 GB more HDD capacity than the Hypertec 160GB PATA HDD (320 GB vs 160 GB). Interface: Serial ATA on the CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM, IDE/ATA on the Hypertec 160GB PATA HDD.

HDD capacity
- 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM:320 GB
- 160GB PATA HDD:160 GB
Interface
- 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM:Serial ATA
- 160GB PATA HDD:IDE/ATA

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM, 160GB PATA HDD
9 specifications	A CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM View product	B Hypertec 160GB PATA HDD View product
Features2 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	320 GB	160 GB
HDD speed	5400 RPM	5400 RPM
InterfaceDiffers	Serial ATA	IDE/ATA
Component forKnown for one	Laptop	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDD sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.5"
Other featuresidentical
Internal	Yes	Yes
USB powered	No	No
Compatible productsKnown for one	IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Operating voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 V

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons