Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM vs Hypertec 160 GB 3.5" SATA-300

5specifications compared
2differ
3identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

The CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM has 160 GB more HDD capacity than the Hypertec 160 GB 3.5" SATA-300 (320 GB vs 160 GB). The Hypertec 160 GB 3.5" SATA-300 has 4,600 RPM more HDD speed than the CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM (10000 RPM vs 5400 RPM).

HDD capacity
- 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM:320 GB
- 160 GB 3.5" SATA-300:160 GB
HDD speed
- 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM:5400 RPM
- 160 GB 3.5" SATA-300:10000 RPM

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM, 160 GB 3.5" SATA-300
9 specifications	A CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 320GB 5400RPM View product	B Hypertec 160 GB 3.5" SATA-300 View product
Features2 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	320 GB	160 GB
HDD speedDiffers	5400 RPM	10000 RPM
Component forKnown for one	Laptop	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDD sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5"
Other featuresidentical
Compatible productsKnown for one	IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Operating voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 / 12 V

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons