Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM vs Hypertec 250GB 3.5" SATA 4200rpm

3specifications compared
2differ
1identical
8known for one product only

Key differences

The Hypertec 250GB 3.5" SATA 4200rpm has 90 GB more HDD capacity than the CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM (250 GB vs 160 GB). The Hypertec 250GB 3.5" SATA 4200rpm has 1,800 RPM more HDD speed than the CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM (7200 RPM vs 5400 RPM).

HDD capacity
- 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM:160 GB
- 250GB 3.5" SATA 4200rpm:250 GB
HDD speed
- 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM:5400 RPM
- 250GB 3.5" SATA 4200rpm:7200 RPM

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM, 250GB 3.5" SATA 4200rpm
11 specifications	A CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM View product	B Hypertec 250GB 3.5" SATA 4200rpm View product
Features2 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	160 GB	250 GB
HDD speedDiffers	5400 RPM	7200 RPM
Interface	Serial ATA	Serial ATA
Component forKnown for one	Laptop	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDD sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5"
TypeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	HDD
Other featuresidentical
InternalKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB poweredKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible productsKnown for one	IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Operating voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 / 12 V
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons