Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM vs Hypertec 146GB Ultra320 SCSI

5specifications compared
3differ
2identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

The CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM has 14 GB more HDD capacity than the Hypertec 146GB Ultra320 SCSI (160 GB vs 146 GB). The Hypertec 146GB Ultra320 SCSI has 9,600 RPM more HDD speed than the CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM (15000 RPM vs 5400 RPM). Interface: Serial ATA on the CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM, Ultra320 SCSI on the Hypertec 146GB Ultra320 SCSI.

HDD capacity
- 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM:160 GB
- 146GB Ultra320 SCSI:146 GB
HDD speed
- 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM:5400 RPM
- 146GB Ultra320 SCSI:15000 RPM
Interface
- 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM:Serial ATA
- 146GB Ultra320 SCSI:Ultra320 SCSI

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM, 146GB Ultra320 SCSI
9 specifications	A CoreParts 2:nd Bay SATA 160GB 5400RPM View product	B Hypertec 146GB Ultra320 SCSI View product
Features3 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	160 GB	146 GB
HDD speedDiffers	5400 RPM	15000 RPM
InterfaceDiffers	Serial ATA	Ultra320 SCSI
Component forKnown for one	Laptop	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDD sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1"
Other featuresidentical
Compatible productsKnown for one	IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad	Unknown — not stated by the source
Drive device, transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	320 MB/s

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons