Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Buffalo 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm vs Buffalo OP-HD2.0T internal hard drive

9specifications compared
3differ
6identical
2known for one product only

Key differences

The Buffalo 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm has 1 mm more width than the Buffalo OP-HD2.0T internal hard drive (105 mm vs 104 mm). The Buffalo 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm has 1 g more weight than the Buffalo OP-HD2.0T internal hard drive (900 g vs 899 g). HDD capacity: 500 GB on the Buffalo 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm, 2 TB on the Buffalo OP-HD2.0T internal hard drive.

HDD capacity
- 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm:500 GB
- OP-HD2.0T internal hard drive:2 TB
Width
- 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm:105 mm
- OP-HD2.0T internal hard drive:104 mm
Weight
- 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm:900 g
- OP-HD2.0T internal hard drive:899 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm, OP-HD2.0T
11 specifications	A Buffalo 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm View product	B Buffalo OP-HD2.0T internal hard drive Model OP-HD2.0T View product
Features1 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	500 GB	2 TB
TypeKnown for one	HDD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	105 mm	104 mm
WeightDiffers	900 g	899 g
Other featuresidentical
InternalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons