Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Buffalo 2TB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm vs Buffalo 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm

10specifications compared
2differ
8identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

The Buffalo 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm has 200 g more weight than the Buffalo 2TB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm (900 g vs 700 g). HDD capacity: 2 TB on the Buffalo 2TB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm, 500 GB on the Buffalo 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm.

HDD capacity
- 2TB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm:2 TB
- 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm:500 GB
Weight
- 2TB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm:700 g
- 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm:900 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 2TB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm, 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm
14 specifications	A Buffalo 2TB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm View product	B Buffalo 500GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm View product
Features1 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	2 TB	500 GB
HDD speed	7200 RPM	7200 RPM
HDD size	3.5"	3.5"
Interface	Serial ATA	Serial ATA
Type	HDD	HDD
Storage drive buffer sizeKnown for one	8 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Operating voltage	5 / 12 V	5 / 12 V
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	5 - 35 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	20 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width	105 mm	105 mm
Depth	30 mm	30 mm
Height	170 mm	170 mm
WeightDiffers	700 g	900 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons