Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Buffalo 1TB, 3.5", 7200rpm vs Buffalo 250GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 4identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

The Buffalo 250GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm has 1 mm more width than the Buffalo 1TB, 3.5", 7200rpm (105 mm vs 104 mm). The Buffalo 1TB, 3.5", 7200rpm has 140 mm more depth than the Buffalo 250GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm (170 mm vs 30 mm). The Buffalo 250GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm has 140 mm more height than the Buffalo 1TB, 3.5", 7200rpm (170 mm vs 30 mm). HDD capacity: 1 TB on the Buffalo 1TB, 3.5", 7200rpm, 250 GB on the Buffalo 250GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm. Interface: Serial ATA II on the Buffalo 1TB, 3.5", 7200rpm, Serial ATA on the Buffalo 250GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm.

  • HDD capacity
    • 1TB, 3.5", 7200rpm:1 TB
    • 250GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm:250 GB
  • Interface
    • 1TB, 3.5", 7200rpm:Serial ATA II
    • 250GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm:Serial ATA
  • Width
    • 1TB, 3.5", 7200rpm:104 mm
    • 250GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm:105 mm
  • Depth
    • 1TB, 3.5", 7200rpm:170 mm
    • 250GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm:30 mm
  • Height
    • 1TB, 3.5", 7200rpm:30 mm
    • 250GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm:170 mm
  • Weight
    • 1TB, 3.5", 7200rpm:899 g
    • 250GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm:900 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 1TB, 3.5", 7200rpm, 250GB 3.5" SATA 7200rpm
10 specifications
Features2 differ
HDD capacityDiffers1 TB250 GB
InterfaceDiffersSerial ATA IISerial ATA
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers104 mm105 mm
DepthDiffers170 mm30 mm
HeightDiffers30 mm170 mm
WeightDiffers899 g900 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons