Product comparison · 2 internal hard drives

Acer HD SATA-80GB/8MB 7200 rpm (incl. carrier) vs HP 72GB, SAS, 10000 rpm, 3G

Add a product
  • 4specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 1identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer HD SATA-80GB/8MB 7200 rpm (incl. carrier) has 8 GB more HDD capacity than the HP 72GB, SAS, 10000 rpm, 3G (80 GB vs 72 GB). The HP 72GB, SAS, 10000 rpm, 3G has 2,800 RPM more HDD speed than the Acer HD SATA-80GB/8MB 7200 rpm (incl. carrier) (10000 RPM vs 7200 RPM). Interface: Serial ATA on the Acer HD SATA-80GB/8MB 7200 rpm (incl. carrier), SAS on the HP 72GB, SAS, 10000 rpm, 3G.

  • HDD capacity
    • HD SATA-80GB/8MB 7200 rpm (incl. carrier):80 GB
    • 72GB, SAS, 10000 rpm, 3G:72 GB
  • HDD speed
    • HD SATA-80GB/8MB 7200 rpm (incl. carrier):7200 RPM
    • 72GB, SAS, 10000 rpm, 3G:10000 RPM
  • Interface
    • HD SATA-80GB/8MB 7200 rpm (incl. carrier):Serial ATA
    • 72GB, SAS, 10000 rpm, 3G:SAS

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of HD SATA-80GB/8MB 7200 rpm (incl. carrier), 72GB, SAS, 10000 rpm, 3G
12 specifications
Features3 differ
HDD capacityDiffers80 GB72 GB
HDD speedDiffers7200 RPM10000 RPM
HDD sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.5"
InterfaceDiffersSerial ATASAS
TypeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHDD
Component forKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceServer/workstation
Hot-swapKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Storage drive buffer sizeKnown for one8 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Operating voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
Other featuresidentical
Drive device, transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source300 MB/s
Compatible productsKnown for oneAltos G530, G5350, R510, R510 m2Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal hard drive comparisons

All internal hard drive comparisons