Product comparison · 2 interface hubs

i-tec USB-C/USB-A Dongle SD, TF and 2x USB (1x USB-A, 1x USB-C) vs Sandberg USB-C/A to 2A+2C Splitter

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 4identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

The Sandberg USB-C/A to 2A+2C Splitter has 2 more ports quantity than the i-tec USB-C/USB-A Dongle SD, TF and 2x USB (1x USB-A, 1x USB-C) (4 vs 2). The Sandberg USB-C/A to 2A+2C Splitter has 1 more USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity than the i-tec USB-C/USB-A Dongle SD, TF and 2x USB (1x USB-A, 1x USB-C) (2 vs 1). The Sandberg USB-C/A to 2A+2C Splitter has 1 more USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantity than the i-tec USB-C/USB-A Dongle SD, TF and 2x USB (1x USB-A, 1x USB-C) (2 vs 1). Windows operating systems supported: Yes on the i-tec USB-C/USB-A Dongle SD, TF and 2x USB (1x USB-A, 1x USB-C), Windows 10, Windows 11 on the Sandberg USB-C/A to 2A+2C Splitter.

  • Ports quantity
    • USB-C/USB-A Dongle SD, TF and 2x USB (1x USB-A, 1x USB-C):2
    • USB-C/A to 2A+2C Splitter:4
  • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity
    • USB-C/USB-A Dongle SD, TF and 2x USB (1x USB-A, 1x USB-C):1
    • USB-C/A to 2A+2C Splitter:2
  • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantity
    • USB-C/USB-A Dongle SD, TF and 2x USB (1x USB-A, 1x USB-C):1
    • USB-C/A to 2A+2C Splitter:2
  • Windows operating systems supported
    • USB-C/USB-A Dongle SD, TF and 2x USB (1x USB-A, 1x USB-C):Yes
    • USB-C/A to 2A+2C Splitter:Windows 10, Windows 11
  • Width
    • USB-C/USB-A Dongle SD, TF and 2x USB (1x USB-A, 1x USB-C):107.2 mm
    • USB-C/A to 2A+2C Splitter:43 mm
  • Depth
    • USB-C/USB-A Dongle SD, TF and 2x USB (1x USB-A, 1x USB-C):20.3 mm
    • USB-C/A to 2A+2C Splitter:43 mm
  • Height
    • USB-C/USB-A Dongle SD, TF and 2x USB (1x USB-A, 1x USB-C):12 mm
    • USB-C/A to 2A+2C Splitter:10 mm
  • Weight
    • USB-C/USB-A Dongle SD, TF and 2x USB (1x USB-A, 1x USB-C):24 g
    • USB-C/A to 2A+2C Splitter:60 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CADONGLEUSBSD, 136-81
30 specifications
Ports & interfaces3 differ
Ports quantityDiffers24
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityDiffers12
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityDiffers12
Card reader integratedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Card reader slotKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible memory cardsKnown for oneMicroSD (TransFlash), SDUnknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 m
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersYesWindows 10, Windows 11
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneAndroid, ChromeOS, iPadOSUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers107.2 mm43 mm
DepthDiffers20.3 mm43 mm
HeightDiffers12 mm10 mm
WeightDiffers24 g60 g
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power supply typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source182 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source95 g
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS, UKCA
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface hub comparisons

All interface hub comparisons