Product comparison · 2 interface hubs

ERAZER X89050 USB 2.0 Black, Blue vs Microconnect USB3.1CUSB3 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C 5000 Mbit/s White

Key differences

Product colour
- X89050 USB 2.0 Black, Blue:Black, Blue
- USB3.1CUSB3 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C 5000 Mbit/s White:White
Weight
- X89050 USB 2.0 Black, Blue:182 g
- USB3.1CUSB3 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C 5000 Mbit/s White:10 g

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of X89050, USB3.1CUSB3
16 specifications	A ERAZER X89050 USB 2.0 Black, Blue Model X89050 View product	B Microconnect USB3.1CUSB3 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C 5000 Mbit/s White Model USB3.1CUSB3 View product
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Ports quantity	4	4
Host interfaceDiffers	USB 2.0	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C
Hub interfacesDiffers	USB 2.0	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5000 Mbit/s
Product colourDiffers	Black, Blue	White
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	182 g	10 g
WidthKnown for one	125 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	120 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	78 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	201 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	179 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	14 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	42 g
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	84719000

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.