All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 interface hubs

Biamp MPX 250 vs iggual IGG320181 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A 5000 Mbit/s Grey

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 2identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

The Biamp MPX 250 has 3 more ports quantity than the iggual IGG320181 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A 5000 Mbit/s Grey (8 vs 5). The Biamp MPX 250 has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the iggual IGG320181 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A 5000 Mbit/s Grey (2 vs 1). The Biamp MPX 250 has 5,000 Mbit/s more data transfer rate than the iggual IGG320181 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A 5000 Mbit/s Grey (10000 Mbit/s vs 5000 Mbit/s). Host interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C on the Biamp MPX 250, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A on the iggual IGG320181 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A 5000 Mbit/s Grey. Product colour: Black on the Biamp MPX 250, Grey on the iggual IGG320181 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A 5000 Mbit/s Grey.

  • Ports quantity
    • 8
    • 5
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • 2
    • 1
  • Data transfer rate
    • 10000 Mbit/s
    • 5000 Mbit/s
  • Product colour
    • Black
    • Grey
  • Power supply type
    • DC
    • USB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
39 specifications
A

Biamp

MPX 250View product
B

iggual

IGG320181 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A 5000 Mbit/s Grey

Model IGG320181

View product
Ports & interfaces4 differ
Ports quantityDiffers85
Host interfaceDiffersUSB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-CUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A
Hub interfacesDiffersUSB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-A, HDMI, RJ-45RJ-45, USB 3.0, USB Type-C
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1
USB 2.0 Type-C ports quantityKnown for one1
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one3
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers21
Card reader integratedKnown for oneNo
DC-in jackKnown for oneNo
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one2
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C ports quantityKnown for one6
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one1
Features2 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers10000 Mbit/s5000 Mbit/s
Housing materialKnown for oneAluminium
Product colourDiffersBlackGrey
Cable typeKnown for oneRound cable
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYes
Cable lengthKnown for one0.135 m
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYes
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for oneYes
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one100 W
Networkidentical
Ethernet interface typeGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
Ethernet LAN data rates10,100,1000 Mbit/s10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3az, IEEE 802.3u
Power1 differ
Power supply typeDiffersDCUSB
Input currentKnown for one10 A
Input voltageKnown for one20 V
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one28 mm
DepthKnown for one108.5 mm
HeightKnown for one14.2 mm
WeightKnown for one41 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)
Package weightKnown for one55 g
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one5 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 80%
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), ETL, RoHS, REACH

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface hub comparisons

All interface hub comparisons