Product comparison · 2 interface hubs

ATEN 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C) vs Ewent EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey

12specifications compared
9differ
3identical
30known for one product only

Key differences

The ATEN 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C) has 7 more ports quantity than the Ewent EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey (8 vs 1). The ATEN 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C) has 4,000 Mbit/s more data transfer rate than the Ewent EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey (5000 Mbit/s vs 1000 Mbit/s). The ATEN 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C) has 32.5 mm more width than the Ewent EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey (56.5 mm vs 24 mm). Product colour: Black on the ATEN 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C), Grey on the Ewent EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey. Products per master (outer) case: 20 pc(s) on the ATEN 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C), 200 pc(s) on the Ewent EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey.

Ports quantity
- 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C):8
- EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey:1
Data transfer rate
- 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C):5000 Mbit/s
- EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey:1000 Mbit/s
Product colour
- 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C):Black
- EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey:Grey
Width
- 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C):56.5 mm
- EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey:24 mm
Depth
- 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C):145 mm
- EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey:56.6 mm
Height
- 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C):15.2 mm
- EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey:17.2 mm
Weight
- 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C):70 g
- EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey:36 g
Products per master (outer) case
- 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C):20 pc(s)
- EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey:200 pc(s)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of US5324-AT, EW9819
42 specifications	A ATEN 2 x 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 Sharing Switch (Host Type: A+C) Model US5324-AT View product	B Ewent EW9819 interface hub USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A + Type-C 1000 Mbit/s Grey Model EW9819 View product
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Ports quantityDiffers	8	1
Hub interfacesDiffers	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C	RJ-45
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	5	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features2 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers	5000 Mbit/s	1000 Mbit/s
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Aluminium, Plastic
Product colourDiffers	Black	Grey
Cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.15 m
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Country of originKnown for one	China	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Ethernet interface typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gigabit Ethernet
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	56.5 mm	24 mm
DepthDiffers	145 mm	56.6 mm
HeightDiffers	15.2 mm	17.2 mm
WeightDiffers	70 g	36 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	150 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	89 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	21 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	55 g
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Box
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cables includedKnown for one	USB Type-C to USB Type-C, USB Type-A to USB Type-C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Quick start guideKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data1 differ
Master (outer) case net weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	11.4 kg
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	520 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	370 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	350 mm
Products per master (outer) caseDiffers	20 pc(s)	200 pc(s)
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	84718000	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	UKCA, CE
Poweridentical
Power supply typeKnown for one	USB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 60 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface hub comparisons

All interface hub comparisons