Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

InLine 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel vs InLine 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)

20specifications compared
13differ
7identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The InLine 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) has 4.9985 Gbit/s more data transfer rate (max) than the InLine 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel (5 Gbit/s vs 0.0015 Gbit/s). The InLine 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel has 5 mm more width than the InLine 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) (85 mm vs 80 mm). The InLine 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel has 58.99 mm more depth than the InLine 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) (60 mm vs 1.01 mm). Output interface: Parallel on the InLine 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) on the InLine 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1). Expansion card standard: PCIe 1.1 on the InLine 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel, PCIe 2.0 on the InLine 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1).

Output interface
- 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel:Parallel
- 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Expansion card standard
- 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel:PCIe 1.1
- 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):PCIe 2.0
Chipset
- 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel:WCH CH382L
- 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):VIA VL805
Data transfer rate (max)
- 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel:0.0015 Gbit/s
- 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):5 Gbit/s
Operating temperature (T-T)
- 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel:0 - 55 °C
- 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):0 - 85 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)
- 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel:-40 - 70 °C
- 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):-25 - 85 °C
Width
- 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel:85 mm
- 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):80 mm
Depth
- 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel:60 mm
- 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):1.01 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 76625E, 76666M
40 specifications	A InLine 76625E interface cards/adapter Internal Parallel Model 76625E View product	B InLine 76666M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Model 76666M View product
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interface	PCIe	PCIe
Output interfaceDiffers	Parallel	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Host interface gender	Male	Male
Expansion card standardDiffers	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0
SATA power connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SATA 15-pin
Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4
Expansion card form factorKnown for one	Low-profile	Unknown — not stated by the source
Parallel ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Internal	Yes	Yes
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Green, Silver
Hot-Plug supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Country of origin	Taiwan	Taiwan
Features2 differ
ChipsetDiffers	WCH CH382L	VIA VL805
Data transfer rate (max)Differs	0.0015 Gbit/s	5 Gbit/s
UASP supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
FIFO (First In, First Out)Known for one	256 B	Unknown — not stated by the source
BidirectionalKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Output currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.9 A
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 55 °C	0 - 85 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-40 - 70 °C	-25 - 85 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	0 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirements3 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Vista, Windows XP	Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1
Linux operating systems supportedDiffers	Kernel 2.6, Kernel 2.6.31, Kernel 2.6.33, Kernel 3.12, Kernel 3.17, Kernel 3.3, Kernel 4.6.4, Linux Kernel 5.10, Linux Kernel 5.11, Linux Kernel 5.12, Linux Kernel 5.13, Linux Kernel 5.14, Linux Kernel 5.15, Linux Kernel 5.19, Linux Kernel 5.4, Linux Kernel 5.8, Linux Kernel 5.9, Linux Kernel 6.2, L	Yes
Server operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008	Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2013, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022
Technical details1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffers	CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), TÜV mark	TÜV mark
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	85 mm	80 mm
DepthDiffers	60 mm	1.01 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Drivers included	Yes	Yes
Manual	Yes	Yes
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	150 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	140 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 mm
Package weightDiffers	40 g	43 g
Package volumeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	700 cm³
Package type	Hanging box	Hanging box
Mounting brackets includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 x 1.01 x 120 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons