Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

InLine 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232 vs TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 0identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI has 395 mm more width than the InLine 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232 (497 mm vs 102 mm). The TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI has 223.3 mm more depth than the InLine 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232 (225 mm vs 1.7 mm). The InLine 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232 has 15 mm more height than the TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI (120 mm vs 105 mm). Only the InLine 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232 has internal. Host interface: PCIe on the InLine 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232, USB Type-C on the TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI.

  • Host interface
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:PCIe
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:USB Type-C
  • Output interface
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:RS-232
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:HDMI
  • Internal
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:Yes
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:No
  • Width
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:102 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:497 mm
  • Depth
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:1.7 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:225 mm
  • Height
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:120 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:105 mm
  • Package width
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:140 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:73 mm
  • Package depth
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:155 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:140 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 76623E, UA520C
24 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffersPCIeUSB Type-C
Output interfaceDiffersRS-232HDMI
Host interface genderKnown for oneMaleUnknown — not stated by the source
Expansion card form factorKnown for oneLow-profileUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
InternalDiffersYesNo
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
FIFO (First In, First Out)Known for one256 BUnknown — not stated by the source
Data bitsKnown for one5, 6, 7, 8, 9Unknown — not stated by the source
Flow control supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Parity bitKnown for oneEven, Odd, Mark, Space, NoUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power managementKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirements2 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Windows 11 x64Yes
Linux operating systems supportedDiffersKernel 2.6, Kernel 2.6.31, Kernel 2.6.33, Kernel 4.6.4Yes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAndroid, ChromeOS, iOS
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers102 mm497 mm
DepthDiffers1.7 mm225 mm
HeightDiffers120 mm105 mm
WeightKnown for one2 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers140 mm73 mm
Package depthDiffers155 mm140 mm
Package heightDiffers30 mm22 mm
Package weightDiffers51 g60 g
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one102 x 1.7 x 120 mmUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons