Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

InLine 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 vs TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 1identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI has 352 mm more width than the InLine 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 (497 mm vs 145 mm). The TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI has 223.94 mm more depth than the InLine 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 (225 mm vs 1.06 mm). The InLine 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 15 mm more height than the TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI (120 mm vs 105 mm). Only the InLine 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has internal. Host interface: PCIe on the InLine 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2, USB Type-C on the TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI.

  • Host interface
    • 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:PCIe
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:USB Type-C
  • Output interface
    • 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:M.2
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:HDMI
  • Internal
    • 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:Yes
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:No
  • Width
    • 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:145 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:497 mm
  • Depth
    • 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:1.06 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:225 mm
  • Height
    • 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:120 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:105 mm
  • Package width
    • 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:125 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:73 mm
  • Package depth
    • 76619I interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:180 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:140 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 76619I, UA520C
27 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffersPCIeUSB Type-C
Output interfaceDiffersM.2HDMI
Host interface genderKnown for oneMaleUnknown — not stated by the source
Expansion card standardKnown for onePCIe 3.0Unknown — not stated by the source
NVMeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of M.2 (M) slotsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
InternalDiffersYesNo
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 85 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 85 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1Yes
Linux operating systems supportedYesYes
Server operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows Server 2012 R2, Windows Server 2013, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAndroid, ChromeOS, iOS
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneTÜV markUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers145 mm497 mm
DepthDiffers1.06 mm225 mm
HeightDiffers120 mm105 mm
WeightKnown for one2 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthDiffers125 mm73 mm
Package depthDiffers180 mm140 mm
Package heightDiffers30 mm22 mm
Package weightDiffers30 g60 g
Package volumeKnown for one700 cm³Unknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one145 x 1.06 x 120 mmUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons