Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

InLine 66698R interface cards/adapter SATA vs InLine 76664I interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 2identical
  • 4known for one product only

Key differences

Host interface: PCI on the InLine 66698R interface cards/adapter SATA, PCIe on the InLine 76664I interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1). Output interface: SATA on the InLine 66698R interface cards/adapter SATA, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) on the InLine 76664I interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1). Supported data transfer rates: 150MB/s on the InLine 66698R interface cards/adapter SATA, 1.5 Mb/s, 12 Mb/s, 480 Mb/s, 5 Gb/s on the InLine 76664I interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1).

  • Host interface
    • 66698R interface cards/adapter SATA:PCI
    • 76664I interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):PCIe
  • Output interface
    • 66698R interface cards/adapter SATA:SATA
    • 76664I interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 66698R, 76664I
10 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffersPCIPCIe
Output interfaceDiffersSATAUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Featuresidentical
ChipsetKnown for oneSilicon Image 3512Unknown — not stated by the source
RAID levelsKnown for one0, 1Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features2 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows 98/98SE/ME/NT4.0/2000/2003 Server/XPWindows XP / Vista / Windows 7
Supported data transfer ratesDiffers150MB/s1.5 Mb/s, 12 Mb/s, 480 Mb/s, 5 Gb/s
Ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons