Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

InLine 66634I interface cards/adapter vs InLine 76664I interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)

5specifications compared
3differ
2identical
5known for one product only

Key differences

The InLine 76664I interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) has 1 more ports quantity than the InLine 66634I interface cards/adapter (2 vs 1). Host interface: PCI on the InLine 66634I interface cards/adapter, PCIe on the InLine 76664I interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1).

Host interface
- 66634I interface cards/adapter:PCI
- 76664I interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):PCIe
Ports quantity
- 66634I interface cards/adapter:1
- 76664I interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):2

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 66634I, 76664I
10 specifications	A InLine 66634I interface cards/adapter Model 66634I View product	B InLine 76664I interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Model 76664I View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	PCI	PCIe
Output interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Serial ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features2 differ
Ports quantityDiffers	1	2
Connectivity technology	Wired	Wired
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	DOS 6.22 Windows 2000, XP 32/64-bit, Server 2003 32/64-bit, Vista 32/64-bit, Server 2008 32/64-bit Linux kernel 2.6.14+	Windows XP / Vista / Windows 7
Mac compatibility	No	No
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.5 Mb/s, 12 Mb/s, 480 Mb/s, 5 Gb/s
Featuresidentical
ChipsetKnown for one	MCS9865	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons