Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

InLine 51127C interface cards/adapter Internal vs InLine 76660N interface cards/adapter Internal M.2

12specifications compared
8differ
4identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

The InLine 76660N interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 3 mm more width than the InLine 51127C interface cards/adapter Internal (135 mm vs 132 mm). The InLine 51127C interface cards/adapter Internal has 30 mm more depth than the InLine 76660N interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 (98 mm vs 68 mm). The InLine 51127C interface cards/adapter Internal has 192 g more package weight than the InLine 76660N interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 (244 g vs 52 g). Host interface: PCI Express on the InLine 51127C interface cards/adapter Internal, PCIe on the InLine 76660N interface cards/adapter Internal M.2. Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 55 °C on the InLine 51127C interface cards/adapter Internal, -40 - 85 °C on the InLine 76660N interface cards/adapter Internal M.2.

Host interface
- 51127C interface cards/adapter Internal:PCI Express
- 76660N interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:PCIe
Operating temperature (T-T)
- 51127C interface cards/adapter Internal:0 - 55 °C
- 76660N interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:-40 - 85 °C
Width
- 51127C interface cards/adapter Internal:132 mm
- 76660N interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:135 mm
Depth
- 51127C interface cards/adapter Internal:98 mm
- 76660N interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:68 mm
Package weight
- 51127C interface cards/adapter Internal:244 g
- 76660N interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:52 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 51127C, 76660N
28 specifications	A InLine 51127C interface cards/adapter Internal Model 51127C View product	B InLine 76660N interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 Model 76660N View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	PCI Express	PCIe
Output interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	M.2
Host interface genderKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Male
Expansion card standardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PCIe 3.0
NVMeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of M.2 (M) slotsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Featuresidentical
ChipsetKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PI6C20400BLE
Data transfer rate (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	64 Gbit/s
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 55 °C	-40 - 85 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-40 - 70 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	0 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirements2 differ
Linux operating systems supportedDiffers	Kernel 2.6.31, Kernel 2.6.33, Kernel 3.12, Kernel 3.17, Kernel 3.3, Kernel 4.6.4	Yes
Server operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019	Windows Server 2012 R2
Technical details1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffers	CE, TÜV mark	TÜV mark, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	132 mm	135 mm
DepthDiffers	98 mm	68 mm
Packaging data1 differ
Mounting brackets includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Package weightDiffers	244 g	52 g
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Hanging box
Other featuresidentical
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Wired	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	6	Unknown — not stated by the source
InterfaceKnown for one	Ethernet	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networking standardsKnown for one	IEEE 1588, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1as, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3az, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons