Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

InLine 51125N interface cards/adapter Internal vs Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe

Add a product
  • 4specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 1identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

The Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe has 78 mm more width than the InLine 51125N interface cards/adapter Internal (174 mm vs 96 mm). The Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe has 69 mm more depth than the InLine 51125N interface cards/adapter Internal (131 mm vs 62 mm). The Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe has 67 g more package weight than the InLine 51125N interface cards/adapter Internal (110 g vs 43 g).

  • Width
    • 51125N interface cards/adapter Internal:96 mm
    • MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:174 mm
  • Depth
    • 51125N interface cards/adapter Internal:62 mm
    • MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:131 mm
  • Package weight
    • 51125N interface cards/adapter Internal:43 g
    • MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:110 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 51125N, MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L
28 specifications
Ports & interfacesidentical
Host interfaceKnown for onePCI ExpressUnknown — not stated by the source
Fiber optic connectorKnown for oneSFPUnknown — not stated by the source
Output interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMini PCIe
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 55 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 70 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8Unknown — not stated by the source
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneKernel 2.6.31, Kernel 2.6.33, Kernel 3.12, Kernel 3.17, Kernel 3.3, Kernel 4.6.4, Linux Kernel 5.10, Linux Kernel 5.11, Linux Kernel 5.12, Linux Kernel 5.13, Linux Kernel 5.14, Linux Kernel 5.15, Linux Kernel 5.19, Linux Kernel 5.4, Linux Kernel 5.8, Linux Kernel 5.9, Linux Kernel 6.2, Linux KernelUnknown — not stated by the source
Server operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022Unknown — not stated by the source
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneFreeBSDUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, TÜV markUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers96 mm174 mm
DepthDiffers62 mm131 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source34 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 g
Packaging data1 differ
Mounting brackets includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightDiffers43 g110 g
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source174 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source131 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source34 mm
Other featuresidentical
Connectivity technologyKnown for oneWiredUnknown — not stated by the source
InterfaceKnown for oneFiberUnknown — not stated by the source
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.3xUnknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
ChipsetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWCH CH384L

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons