Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

InLine 33271A interface cards/adapter USB Type-C, HDMI, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) vs Ugreen 35058 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 2identical
  • 32known for one product only

Key differences

Host interface: USB Type-C on the InLine 33271A interface cards/adapter USB Type-C, HDMI, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1), USB Type-A on the Ugreen 35058 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth. Product colour: Grey on the InLine 33271A interface cards/adapter USB Type-C, HDMI, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1), Black on the Ugreen 35058 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth.

  • Host interface
    • 33271A interface cards/adapter USB Type-C, HDMI, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):USB Type-C
    • 35058 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth:USB Type-A
  • Product colour
    • 33271A interface cards/adapter USB Type-C, HDMI, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):Grey
    • 35058 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth:Black

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 33271A, 35058
38 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffersUSB Type-CUSB Type-A
Output interfaceDiffersUSB Type-C, HDMI, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)Bluetooth
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Bluetooth versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.4
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersGreyBlack
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source
PurposeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePC / Notebook / Tablet
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Featuresidentical
Data transfer rate (max)Known for one5 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Wireless rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 m
Poweridentical
Power supply typeKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
USB poweredKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one20 - 80%Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersYesWindows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8.1
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneMacOSUnknown — not stated by the source
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, RoHS, TÜV markUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one31 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one110 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one10 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one51 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one55 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one150 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one20 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one70 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Package volumeKnown for one200 cm³Unknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for oneHanging boxUnknown — not stated by the source
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Other featuresidentical
Ports quantityKnown for one5Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lengthKnown for one0.15 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum resolutionKnown for one3840 x 2160 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one31 x 110 x 10 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for oneAluminiumUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons