Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

InLine Slot Bracket DB9male to 10 Pin Internal header direct 1:1 0.6m vs InLine USB 2.0 Slot Bracket 2x USB Type A female to

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 3identical
  • 6known for one product only

Key differences

The InLine USB 2.0 Slot Bracket 2x USB Type A female to has 30 g more weight than the InLine Slot Bracket DB9male to 10 Pin Internal header direct 1:1 0.6m (59 g vs 29 g). The InLine USB 2.0 Slot Bracket 2x USB Type A female to has 50 mm more package width than the InLine Slot Bracket DB9male to 10 Pin Internal header direct 1:1 0.6m (175 mm vs 125 mm). The InLine USB 2.0 Slot Bracket 2x USB Type A female to has 40 mm more package depth than the InLine Slot Bracket DB9male to 10 Pin Internal header direct 1:1 0.6m (225 mm vs 185 mm). Connector 1 gender: Male on the InLine Slot Bracket DB9male to 10 Pin Internal header direct 1:1 0.6m, Female on the InLine USB 2.0 Slot Bracket 2x USB Type A female to.

  • Connector 1 gender
    • Slot Bracket DB9male to 10 Pin Internal header direct 1:1 0.6m:Male
    • USB 2.0 Slot Bracket 2x USB Type A female to:Female
  • Weight
    • Slot Bracket DB9male to 10 Pin Internal header direct 1:1 0.6m:29 g
    • USB 2.0 Slot Bracket 2x USB Type A female to:59 g
  • Package width
    • Slot Bracket DB9male to 10 Pin Internal header direct 1:1 0.6m:125 mm
    • USB 2.0 Slot Bracket 2x USB Type A female to:175 mm
  • Package depth
    • Slot Bracket DB9male to 10 Pin Internal header direct 1:1 0.6m:185 mm
    • USB 2.0 Slot Bracket 2x USB Type A female to:225 mm
  • Package weight
    • Slot Bracket DB9male to 10 Pin Internal header direct 1:1 0.6m:31 g
    • USB 2.0 Slot Bracket 2x USB Type A female to:66 g
  • Package volume
    • Slot Bracket DB9male to 10 Pin Internal header direct 1:1 0.6m:500 cm³
    • USB 2.0 Slot Bracket 2x USB Type A female to:800 cm³
  • Cable length
    • Slot Bracket DB9male to 10 Pin Internal header direct 1:1 0.6m:0.6 m
    • USB 2.0 Slot Bracket 2x USB Type A female to:0.35 m

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 33208C, 33391
16 specifications
Features1 differ
Connector 1 genderDiffersMaleFemale
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source350 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 mm
WeightDiffers29 g59 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers125 mm175 mm
Package depthDiffers185 mm225 mm
Package weightDiffers31 g66 g
Package volumeDiffers500 cm³800 cm³
Other features1 differ
Cable lengthDiffers0.6 m0.35 m
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 x 350 x 120 mm
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneGreyUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneULUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons